Tag: civil liberties

YouGov poll for Economist - Civil Liberties

74% support CCTV, 51% think police should be able to build up the DNA database so that eventually they hold DNA on every citizen and 61% support detention of 42 days

Anonymous witnesses and the Common Law

Jack Straw announced this morning on Radio 4 that emergency legislation would be introduced to permit anonymous witnesses in criminal trials, following the Law Lords' sending back of a case to the Appeal Court in which anonymous witnesses were used.

David Davis, Conservatives and Hypocrisy

David Davis and the Conservative blogosphere have made much of how they hate CCTV and the DNA database - conveniently forgetting that these things were introduced by the last Conservative government.

Not standing against Davis is political cowardice

Our party leader and Prime Minister says about David Davis' resignation: "Everyone now recognises this is a stunt that has become a farce" - a sentiment repeated often enough on this site. But standing for election is a deeply serious matter, and fighting a byelection on the 42 days legislation and erosion of our civil liberties can not be dismissed so lightly.


The Lords will defend our liberties...

How ironic that, following the narrow passing of the 42 days legislation by the Commons, that we now depend on their Lordships to defend our traditional liberties. Not for the first time either.


‘42 days’ is about lives, not popularity

A poll in today’s Telegraph suggests 65 per cent of the electorate supports an extension of pre-trial detention for terrorist suspects to 42 days. The only surprising thing about that figure is how low it is.

I spoke to a Tory frontbencher last week, who effectively admitted that in government his party would be far more likely to support this kind of measure, on the basis that a government’s first duty is protection of the country’s citizens, whereas the duty of the opposition… isn’t, really. Pretty shameful attitude. Labour, in the years BT*, voted regularly against the annual renewal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act. Only under Tony did we come to our senses and realise that only parties which take security seriously in opposition can be trusted with government.

The same is true today. The 42 days clause should be supported, not because it’s popular (though it is) but because it will help protect people. If the Tories understand this but oppose it for party political reasons, then they are not fit to govern.

*Before Tony

Visit Tom's blog (if you can stomach it).


28 into 42 won't go!

Back in the autumn of 2005 Tony Blair experienced his first ever Commons defeat. A healthy majority of 66 was turned into a 31 vote defeat on the key vote on the terrorism bill. Tony Blair, a prime minister who possessed impressive skills of persuasion, could not convince enough of his own MPs to back an increased limit of 90 days on the detention of terrorism suspects without charge, even with the vocal support of the chief constables. What chance Gordon?

The scene is now set for next week's battle with the government apparently pressing ahead with plans that would allow the police to hold terrorism suspects for up to 42 days before they are charged.


Some say such measures are a necessary evil but I cannot help feeling that they are a step too far? What do others think?

Livingstone calls on Labour to learn lessons from London

In a thoughtful article in today's Guardian (9 May), Ken Livingstone calls on Labour to learn the lessons from last week's elections in London.

42 days... the next problem

At times like these we do not need further self-inflicted wounds, but the 42 days legislation promises to be just that.

Grassroots rejects detention extension

In a poll of over 100 readers, Labourhome.org has discovered that three quarters of members and supporters oppose government proposals to extend detention without trial beyond 28 days.

Compass: Urgent debate on terror bill

Today Compass has launched a debate and consultation on the counter terrorism bill. We’re delighted that both Jacqui Smith the Home Secretary and Shami Chakrabarti Director of human rights group Liberty have set out the arguments both for and against the government’s proposals on the Compass website at www.compassonline.org.uk. The articles are complimented with a consultation which will run until Friday 15 February.

Take part in the consultation and speak out on the proposals