simonmagnus Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 02:33:53 PM GMT Facebook
tags: Ian Oakley, vile tactics, conservatives, trolling (all tags)
by orzr on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 02:50:28 PM GMT
Pretending that criminal activity by a member of any party somehow implies endorsement or approval by the leader of the party is a "vile tactic".
Should we take any law-breaking by Labour party members as indicative of the nature of the Labour party and its leader? I thought not.
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 03:00:40 PM GMT
[ Parent ]
by PeterSam on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 03:21:23 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 03:59:09 PM GMT
by PeterSam on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:04:18 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:18:29 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:20:37 PM GMT
by HHemmelig on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:35:50 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:44:24 PM GMT
by PeterSam on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 06:22:01 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 06:42:44 PM GMT
by Boyce on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:41:48 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 04:45:43 PM GMT
by Boyce on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 06:48:08 PM GMT
I don't have any party affiliation and I'm far from decided who I'm voting for next election. I just think it's important to distinguish between "vile tactics" and the isolated acts of one individual, of whatever party.
by PeterSam on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 07:26:28 PM GMT
Boyce - I'm with you here. It's unfortunate that this particular contributor (SM) seems to be incapable of anything more than scurrilous posts that contain unsubstantiated allegations. I shouldn't let it irritate me, but it's gutter politics for which 'vile' would be an apt word.
I prefer the more honest, and genuinly researched, assessments as exist elsewhere on this site. Wether the genuine 'Labour' supporters can recover the party from New Labour, I don't know. (Have to sign out now)!
by simonmagnus on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 09:35:58 PM GMT
by PeterSam on Tue Aug 05, 2008 at 11:25:19 PM GMT
by AngryVoter on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 10:15:38 AM GMT
Simon, am I right in thinking you're a leftie troll?
I mean, it's all well and good you have a go at a Tory for some fiddling, but when it happens on both sides of the house for a start.
Furthermore, don't you find it a bit much to then hurl insults at everyone else that comes up with counter claims because you stated yourself that "nobody had been convicted" on the Labour side [blatantly untrue] and 20 seconds in Google doth not equate to working for CCHQ. I suggest you take a more mature line to threads and blog-posts here rather than blindly beleive everything the Guardian posts.
by simonmagnus on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 02:18:11 PM GMT
by DevonChap on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 03:07:11 PM GMT
by simonmagnus on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 04:22:28 PM GMT
by AngryVoter on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 04:25:35 PM GMT
OOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWW! OW OW OWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW! etc etc.
Kidding aside.
I am thinking Simon is a bit of a blind supporter of Labour, his rushed responces and largely immature writing style suggesting he's young, maybe even younger than Jkitleft. Still, internet takes alsorts I suppose.
Just to add to this to Simon is that Labour will never use any more corruption stories against the Tories or the lib dems. Why? Simple, they won't lest their own closets start to rattle as the bleached bone fingers start to scratch at the door.
It's an unfortunate reality of politics here in the UK and has "Cross-grassroots" consensus, we all dislike our politicians have a fiddle on the expenses because the damn system is so murky, and another thing that also has "Cross-grassroots" consensus is some sort of major overhaul of the expenses system.
Now, admittedly so far the only party promising that concretely is that of the Tories at present, but it's entirely likely Labour will swing in after them sooner or later for the sake of the country, rather than their parties.
I mean, we shouldn't also forget that Labour enacted various laws that would help them root out corruption, it just bit them back when they pushed the limits of those new laws with the cash-for-peerages scandal.
I understand this, I suggest you do too.
by simonmagnus on Wed Aug 06, 2008 at 04:59:23 PM GMT