5 reasons why Obama wont lose

A recent Rasmussen poll has McCain and Obama in a statistical dead heat, with McCain just 1% ahead. While this is the only poll to show a McCain lead, many, including Guido, have suggested McCain’s experience is showing through against Obama and a “backlash” has started after his European tour. For me the foreign trip was needed to show his statesman abilities and now he is back in the country can focus on the campaign. He will still win (I hope not to jinx him) but it will be closer than the landslide people may have been expecting. Here are the 5 reasons why Obama will carry the Presidency.

1. State polling – National polls at this time are not much use in predicting the election outcome. It is a long time away and the real polling is about how each state will vote - Bush showed what can be done if you win the right states and lose the popular vote. Therefore any national poll has to be treated with scepticism about its accuracy in predicting a general election. (But look out for Fox focussing on the national polls as they will look better for McCain).

State polling shows Obama in much rosier position. Of the states that Bush won in 2004, with an Electoral College margin of just 286-252, 7 of these are now leaning towards Obama. Of the States that voted Kerry in 2004, Obama has increased the Democrats lead in every one of them (with the exception of rock solid Massachusetts, Kerry’s home state ).

Those 7 states that Bush won in 2004 are now favouring Obama and carry a total 70 electoral votes between them. Obama actually needs to hold just 17 of these 70 electoral votes to gain the Whitehouse. Florida with its 27 electoral votes which went to Bush 2000-2004 is only just with McCain by 0.5%, if McCain does not land Florida, it is almost impossible for him.

Source: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/maps/obama_vs_mccain/?map=10

2. Momentum – Obama has great charisma and can deliver a speech very well, even when under pressure. His speech after losing New Hampshire was one of the best in the campaign and his 2004 convention speech and Berlin experience show that he knows how to hold and wow an audience.

His set piece acceptance speech will be the most watch speech of his campaign and I think will be the defining moment of the race. If he delivers, as I suspect he will, an amazing acceptance speech, the bounce and subsequent momentum will carry him well into the campaign. It will be the thing that most Americans remember about him.

McCain is not as great at these set pieces and with the Republican convention following the Democrats he will be directly compared. Neither Gore, nor Kerry, could reach the Bill Clinton heights of public speaking and couldn’t get the “big mo” going from the convention. Obama will, and it set up the final stages nicely.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Democratic_National_Convention

3. Supporters – The support for the Democrats has been massive during the primaries. In New Hampshire for example, a key swing state, 280,000 people voted in the Democratic primary compared to 220,000 in the Republican race. In all of the “toss up” states, the voting in the Democratic primary was a good 20% above that in the Republicans (it was double in Ohio – a key swing state with 20 electoral votes). The Democrats one problem was that Michigan and Florida did not run primaries in two key states, which may come back to haunt them (although despite this, Hillary received more votes in the uncontested Michigan election that John McCain did in a contested one). The lack of groundwork and the inability to build goodwill will set Obama back here.

Despite this, the Democrats still have a much higher level of public support and activists working on their campaigns. As campaigners will know, it is not won or lost on leg work alone, but it sure helps.

Source: http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/

4. Senate Seats - Of 35 Senate seats up for re-election this year, 23 are now held by Republicans. Of these 35 seats there are 10 that are seen as “toss up” states, 9 of which are Repbulican. A worse case scenario for the Democrats is that they lose their 1 “toss-up” seat and end up with 48 – senators (with 2 independents caucusing with them). However it is likely, following polling, that the Republicans will lose at least 3 or 4 of these, with a possibility of losing all 9. Also in Colorado, New Hampshire, New Jersey the Dems lead and the incumbent Republican is retiring. The Dems are even ahead in Alaska, where Republican Ted Stephens has recently been indicted after “scheming to conceal thousands of dollars worth of gifts from a major employer in his state”. The Republicans have said themselves that only 2 of the 9 seats are likely to be safe - one marginally and one by a long way.

The Republicans will have to pour resources into these states to ensure that the democrats don’t make it to 60 seats in the Senate, a filibuster proof – veto proof majority. In US politics the Presidency is important, but the importance of controlling the House and Senate should not be underestimated.

Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/02/dems.senate/index.html

5. Fundraising – In 2000 the Republicans raised over $720 compared to the Democrats £520m, in 2004 the difference was $160m with the Dems up to $730m and the Reps $890m. Currently in this election cycle the Democrats have raised just $40m less that the Reps who raised $457m. Both have $129m cash in hand as the republicans have spend $40m more so far. Which means for the first time since Clinton the Democrats are fighting the Republicans with a level playing field when it comes to war chests, and the Republicans have more Senate seats to defend along with all their Congresssional Seats and 5 Governorships.

Source: http://www.opensecrets.org/parties/index.php?cmte=&cycle=2008

Much has been made of Obama’s decision to opt out of state funding (that limits candidate to spending around $80 in the short campaign) however this was the right move. Barack Obama also has an awesome and unmatchable fundraising potential. He has currently brought in over $378m compared to McCains $180m and will be able to outspend him by 2-1. This has been made possible by the hundreds of thousands of individual donors that have contributed small amounts to the campaign.

In a general election the ability to outspend rivals has always helped the Republican candidates, but this time they will struggle to match Obama, who will fill the airwaves with adverts from now until election day.

I think i could struggle to 10 – but wont. All in all the message is don't panic!

6. Gravitas
7. George Bush
8. Youthful and in-touch
9. The pendulum swing in politics
10. It happen on the West Wing


Display: Sort:

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#1)

The Polls showed Kerry further ahead last time.

This is actually the second poll giving McCain a lead, Gallup US/Today was the first:

http://www.order-order.com/2008/07/first-poll-shows-obama-hit-by-jonah.html

He is losing momentum....

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#10)

Actually, although the polling lead for Kerry was indeed slightly bigger at this point in 2004, when you break out the cross tabs, Obama is coalescing support around him  far better than Kerry did. Obama's numbers are more robust than Kerry's were.

Also, the Gallup/USA Today poll you refer to had major flaws in the methodology. Its sample assumed that since the previous poll was taken, registration of Republican voters had increased by a whopping 11%, when in actual fact it had declined. See http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-abramowitz/about-that-new-iusa-today_b_115663.html for a detailed brief. Basically though, the poll oversampled Republicans. 

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#12)

And more up to date polls have now been released...

http://www.dailykos.com/hotlist/add/2008/8/7/93728/51433/main//

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#2)

Can I just ask, why is McCain seen to have more experience? Especially on foreign policy? I'm sorry, being shot down 5 times in Vietnam doesn't make you experienced with foreign policy, it just makes you a crappy pilot.


Being a war hero, which I'm not sure he is, doesn't make you the right candidate in terms of foreign policy. I'm not even sure he was that much of a war hero. He wasn't a good soldier, coming 894th out of 900 naval officers at training in navy academies.


He is a dangerous man. He believes we can win in Iraq, but only by being even tougher. This was btw, why he thinks America lost in Vietnam, because they didn't fight hard enough.


This is a man who thought that Iran was funding Al-Qaeda, which basically means he doesn't understand anything about Islam.


He is also a man who is economically illiterate. And he takes all his lessons from a man who helped cause the Enron scandal. This will effect us more directly than Iraq. Phil Gramm helped to kickstart deregulation of markets, including the mortgage market, and sub-prime mortgages have led to disaster for poor homeowners across the Atlantic.

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#3)

We just hope that the American electorate vote sensibly and vote Obama, otherwise it'll be an endorsement of Bush and a continuation of his disastrous policies. But it'll be close, largely because the Republicans have made race an issue and many poor white working class will be conned in going along with what they say. 

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#4)

McCain will win and we all know why. 

Obama displayed tragic hubris in Europe - the grandstanding will not go over well. America see's he is popular is Europe - and then wonders why....its not like Europe has America's best interests at heart.

Look at the polls, its a dead heat and thats WITH all the Obama fawning - imagine what will happen when the gaffe's and the swiftboating really gears up.

Although President McCain will have to deal with a strong Democrat Congress. 

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#5)

No he isn't. Its the time 'for a change factor' and Iraq. Americans don't like being taken into a war they can't win; thats why they always invade small countries. They need someone to exit Iraq with some dignity, and it can't be a Republican. I still find it incredible that McCain's only qualification for leadership is that he was a Vietnam POW. Its as crazy as Ming Cambell's claim to lead the Lib Dems that he was once an Olympic runner. The Republicans will pull all the stops out and make this the dirtiest campaign in history. They've probably already signed up Lynton Crosby. It'll be a travesty of justice and decency if McCain were to win. He doesn't deserve it.

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#6)

There are two poisonous Australians in elections across the English speaking world: Rupert Murdoch and Lynton Crosby.

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#7)

A number of Americans I know who previously supported Obama have now stopped since listening to his speech in full from Europe.

They've also started to look a little more into his policies and are slowly shying away from him as his position is rapidly changing in an attempt to garner support from the American Right.

Inconsistencies on Iraq and other policy areas such as the energy industry as well as a lack of spontaneity in answering more difficult questions, typically with a lot of "umming" and "Erring" and stumbling in responce are also beginning to see chinks in the "Change" armour.

This is in comparison to McCain's ability to bat back even the hardest of questions in a largely respectable manner.

He managed to handle the "Gay issue" in an incredible manner on a chat show recently. McCain is attempting to diffuse an issue that would see him gain support from both left and right by removing the M-word issue itself, something he learnt from the UK, which also did the same.

David Cameron also suffered a lack of spontaneity in question answering during his first year or so at the top of the Tory food chain and for it he did suffer for it in both the media and the party itself.

Since then his wife has apparently been helping him by asking him tough questions at random times until he could answer them, since then he's moved onto the audacity of the CameronDirect program. Maybe Obama needs something similar?

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#8)

It's just that McCain bases his foreign policy 'experience' on getting shot down 5 times in Vietnam, and then being a POW. That makes him a bad pilot, and nothing else.


I'm not sure how well he did on Ellen DeGeneres' show. He looked uncomfortable. And either he supports full marriage rights, or doesn't support civil union rights. But he didn't look comfortable in the position he was conveying.


I was personally supporting John Edwards, as he shifted the debate away from the wedge issues that have corrupted Americain politics for so long now. The Democrats are now debating healthcare, and the environment in a serious way, and have shifted this year's election to the left.


My personal opinion on gay marriage, is that it's actually one of the cruelest inequalities at denying people rights. Because a marriage isn't such a quid pro quo financial matter for two families anymore. It is an expression of love. And to deny someone marriage, is to deny someone love. 

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#9)

The problem McCain has is he is fighting on too many fronts. Obama has a lock (more or less) on all the Kerry states from 2004 and only needs to flip Ohio to win. As it is, Obama is marginally ahead in Ohio (using www.fivethirtyeight.com and Nate Silver's regression models) and New Mexico, Colorado, Nevada, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, Montana and Missouri are all in play. When you add in Iowa which at the moment is firmly Obama's and his strength in states like Georgia, Mississippi and South Carolina, which will see record turnouts from black communities, McCain is under assault from all fronts. He is going to have to spend resources defending states Republican have in past been able to ignore, which will redirect funds from 'swing states.' Obviously, this is far from over but the signs are good for Obama.

Re: 5 reasons why Obama wont lose (#11)

Exactly. Solid Republican states like Alaska and Montana are suddenly up for grabs. Indiana is also up for grabs, and Virginia with 13 electoral votes is looking good for Obama. That last state is very important. Because even if Obama loses in Ohio and Florida, what Obama proved in the primaries is that he can challenge in the smaller swing states, and in largely Republican states. So if Obama won all the 2004 Kerry states, and Virginia, then he would only have to win another state to win. Well, 5 electoral votes. And Iowa is firmly in his column, which would give him 272. New Mexico would give him 270, and Colorado 274.