Why are we wasting our positive news on the media?

The press is unsympathetic or downright hostile to Labour, yet Labour is full of newsmakers pumping out press releases every day. And with increasing numbers using the Internet to search for both local and national news, the positive Labour stories are still hard to find online.

Now a new site - Labour Matters - aims to help change that for the better...


The day after the 2008 local elections and London elections many of us must have felt deflated and nervous about Labour's future electability, I know I did. The corporate media, mostly fair weather friends at best, had spent months highlighting Labour's weaknesses and ignoring our successes. All the talk was of an inevitable change of government whenever Gordon Brown decided to go to the country.

In London the media was even more hostile. The Evening Standard had actively campaigned against Ken Livingstone and had been victorious. It might not be true that it was "The Sun wot won it" but The Standard almost certainly lost it for Labour in London.

Of course we know all this, many of us have complained about media bias for years. The question is what can we do about it? That is what I asked myself anyway!

We are the newsmakers
Like an increasing number of people, the Internet is my first choice for information. I no longer buy a newspaper, instead I have all the newspaper's RSS feeds deliver news directly to me each morning. If I want to read what's happening on the Council I served on for eight years I search the Web too.

And then it struck me: Labour is full of newsmakers who publish press releases in the hope that an unsympathetic media would deign to include some of it in an article. But Councillors are often thwarted by a local media disinterested in politics outside of an election; MEPs find it hard to be relevant to the many local papers their constituencies cover; and MPs often find their press releases ignored by the national media altogether.

If not printed, all that good news is lost forever.

Bypass the corporate media
What Labour needed was a publishing tool to save all this positive publicity and make it available to anybody who was interested in, say, Labour action in their local area or the views on a hot topic by their MP. It needed to avoid adding to workloads of already busy people too.

So I got to work and created Labour Matters. A week later I started writing test articles to see whether people really were using the Internet to find out about both local and national issues, and they are! Even though Labour Matters isn't yet published in Google News and the like, even the most mundane of local issue was being searched for and read.

Ready for your news
Today, 8 July 2008, Labour Matters passed a milestone by moving into beta stage. What that means is that we are now able to accept press releases from elected Labour representatives. After registering with labour Matters, Councillors, MPs, MEPs, etc., can simply email their press releases, just as they might email the newsdesks.

The difference is that Labour Matters will publish them in full without adding any journalistic spin or editing. That's it: just register once and add news@labourmatters.com to your normal press release email list!

We're not publicising this very widely until the Autumn because we still have some improvements and further testing to do, but if you are or know somebody Labour who issues press releases, let them know about this new service. You have nothing to lose and everything to gain!

Display: Sort:

Re: Why are we wasting our positiv (#1)

Excellent

Errr.... (#2)

Why are you "wasting" these stories in the media?

Well presumably because you want people and voters to hear about them. There is no point in circulating them amongst the activists because they all vote Labour anyway.

You need other voters - non activists - and that means putting your story in front of them because they won't come looking for it.

So, the quick answer to your question is this - you have no choice.


Re: Errr.... (#3)

Is there any chance someone can flush that floater away..its starting to pong and i think its the stink of a tory stooge working for CCHQ.

Re: Errr.... (#4)

I am a member of no party - never have been. I refuse to toe "party lines" as I insist on thinking for myself. If you are ever in the Northwest let me know and you can come and look me in the eye. You'll find that I'm just what I say I am.

I pimp for no party - not yours, not the tories, not the libs - none. You all have faults - plenty of them - and no party strikes me as being fit to govern at present. They are all flawed.

Brown is a hopeless ideaolgue who seems to be afraid of his own party and the media. His label of "McCavity" is well earned.

Cameron..... well he could anything. Nobody knows. To date he does not look like a primeminister in waiting and he needs to be more ruthless with his party and clear out the deadwood.

Clegg? Hahahaaaaa :-)

 

The truth, SimonMagnus, is that you need people like me on this blog because I will tell you what I think. I'm not loyal to the party and so exposing flaws in ideas and theories doesn't bother me. From your point of view you need to acknowledge that surrounding yourself only with like-minded individuals will generate a false sense of security and a skewed point of view. History shows that a collection of "yes men" achieve nothing except failure.

I'll tell you what I think - it may not be want you WANT hear, but it may be what you NEED to hear. 

Re: Errr.... (#6)

Its all well and good for you to just sit there and say they are all flawed but they are only human for christ sake,show me someone who doesn't have flaws and i will show you a liar.
You may like the idea of Anarchy but i don't,i used to when i was a child but then i grew up a realised the world needs people to shape and change it and i know it doesn't always go to plan but at least these people have a damned good go so as for you saying we need people like you well i think not mate as you are just another one of the masses who thinks were all doomed but can't decide on how to solve it,no  matter how much i don't like the other partys ideas at least they try to make a difference which is alot more than can be said for all those doubters and naysayers.

Re: Errr.... (#9)

"Its all well and good for you to just sit there and say they are all flawed but they are only human for christ sake,show me someone who doesn't have flaws and i will show you a liar."

Flaws I will tolerate. Lack of ability in people aspiring to the highest office in the land I will not tolerate. Gordon lacks leadership and Cameron is yet to exhibit any.


"You may like the idea of Anarchy..."

I'm a libertarian not an anarchist.


"i know it doesn't always go to plan but at least these people have a damned good go so as for you saying we need people like you well i think not mate as you are just another one of the masses who thinks were all doomed but can't decide on how to solve it,"

You've misunderstood me. Why do I hang out here amongst a group of people whose political belief system I don't share? It is a simple answer. What I hope to find are ideas that are heading in the right direction, people thinking of concepts that will help us ALL and make Britain a better place. The first stage in this is to rigorously question the idea or the target, to attempt to divine its flaws and to improve it. This process cannot succeed amongst completely like-minded people. You need contrarian viewpoints and if you can defend your idea and show it's robust then we've advanced.

All successful ideas and ideaologies go through this stage. All the failed ones avoid it.

Re: Errr.... (#7)

Maybe you should tell the tories on conservativehome your veiws as well the dib dums they would love to hear some of your pearls of wisdom ;o)

Re: Errr.... (#8)

"Maybe you should tell the tories on conservativehome your veiws "

I do.


"as well the dib dums"

I don't. The Lib Dems are just too ineffectual

Re: Errr.... (#5)

You're very quick to defend yourself (below) but seem to have either miscomprehended what was written or didn't read what I wrote in the first place.

Labour Matters is not intended to replace sending press releases to the media.

The content of Labour Matters is available to all, not just activists. Ordinary people already find our content via Google etc. In fact it's notable that people aren't searching for 'Labour' and the like, but their own home towns, councillors and MPs, as well as the issues we've written test articles for.

Both these points are clear in what I wrote.