Message from America?

I have been looking with envious eyes at the successes of Barack Obama's campaign in securing the Democratic nomination. Gazed in wonder at the huge demonstrations of enthusiasm bordering on hero worship that seem to accompany every public appearance, memories of 1997 come flooding back.

People do point out that the opinion polls do not seem to indicate that this enthusiasm is shared by all Americans, last night Obama's lead in the poll of polls was only around 3% and narrowing. Nonetheless I still wonder if his campaign has some lessons for the Labour Party in our current dire electoral situation. 



Two things are probably true. The American political system is a long way from how things happen here and it is risky to say that what works in one system will automatically work in the other (despite Obama's enthusiasm for recreating PMQ's within the American system). Secondly it is probably also true that there are things we can learn from the Obama campaign.

What Obama has successfully done is to set out a vision for the future expressed in a way that resonates with millions of American voters. It is a clear and positive vision of hope which has attracted a new younger audience and at the same time has rejuvenated many people who felt trapped by deeply conservative, moribund, yet powerful political and social institutions.


His personal charisma is, of course, also a significant factor in his success. His clear and strong leadership allied to an inclusive approach have also been very important. Perhaps most telling of all has been the trust that he has placed in his supporters, devolving real decision making powers to them and trusting that the outcomes would be good for him and his campaign. The strong organisation that has emerged and the results they have achieved show that he was right to put his faith in those who wish him well.


So it seems there may be much to gain from looking at what the Obama campaign has achieved, and the contrast with the way our Party and Government works could not be clearer.


There are of course dangers for the Obama approach in our system.


Is this sort of Presidential style really suited to our politics? Won’t it lead to policy on the hoof? Won’t it risk further alienating the party in government from its membership, the Unions, already disgruntled Public Sector workers and other natural allies? Won’t it further undermine Cabinet led government?


What happens once we are in government and we have to deliver the vision we have so compellingly articulated? Isn’t that exactly the mistake New Labour made in the early days? Doesn’t it risk the sort of electoral meltdown Labour is facing now? Obama has never been tested in government, how do we know that the approach that has worked so well in seeking Office will sustain him once he is actually in Office?


All of these and other comments are fair and need to be taken into consideration, but does this mean we have to give in to the counsel of despair, to focus our attentions on managing out hope and dampening expectations? This will not persuade people that we are worth supporting.

To simply dismiss the Obama campaign as uniquely American because it was in the context of the incredibly complex system of pimaries and caucuses may be to deny ourselves some valuable insights into the things that motivate and inspire people.

Might it be better if we drew on the best of the Obama campaign? What if could see Labour working with our supporters and allies to collectively set out in clear language a vision for the future of Britain, a fair inclusive and prosperous country, sure of it’s place in the world? A Labour Party that trusts its members, allies and supporters and works with them to develop and communicate the vision?

It may alienate the deeply conservative, the cynical or those fearful of change, but it will give us something to campaign for and to believe in. Perhaps I am being naïve, but I hope and believe that I’m not the only one.



Display: Sort:

Re: Message from America? (#1)

The problem is with America the more money you have the better chance you have of being elected.

But the difference is and it's happening here more and more now is big business is taking over, nobody expects or thinks America is run by one man or do they, America is run by big business.

Re: Message from America? (#2)

The american politics and money question is an interesting one.  Yes you do need oodles of cash for a campaign, particularly the competitive races.  And I don't want that here. But the story from the States is still an instructive one.  

The Democrats became reliant on 'soft money' raised by the party and by big (& sometimes corporate) donors.  Then the McCain (yes he) Feingold campaign finance reform got rid of that - though some is back in the form of 527 groups.  But what it has meant is that the Democrats were forced to find other sources of funding. Its supporter base.  The internet has certainly helped make that easier as well.  And, as things get more sophisticated, individuals get the chance to support their local candidate(s) and candidates that they really connect to and believe in; rather than just giving to the national party as a whole.  So you get groups like Act Blue http://www.actblue.com/ - "a PAC allowing individuals and groups to channel their progressive dollars to candidates and movements of their choosing." And rallying cries of "more and better Democrats" - which actually means something because you can support it with deeds, with little donations, both in primaries (selections) and for the election campaign itself. 
 
Wouldn't that be great if we could do something similar here?  We would be able to send messages to Labour HQ about the direction we wanted the party to go in and the people we wanted to help take us there.  And we could have more say about where our money is going - ie. building up a local party effort and spent by the CLP, rather than on national billboard campaigns or on a handful of marginal seats where almost all of Labour's resources tend to go. 

Of course, the UK is not quite so candidate-focused as America.  And I'm not entirely sure where such strategies fit in with our proposed party finance laws.  But I know from my own experience that my activism and enthusiam levels go markedly up when I am supporting / campaigning for Labour candidates I really believe in; rather than just the Labour brand / party as a whole. 

Re: Message from America? (#3)

And on the same theme as my comment, I've just seen this inspiring story: http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB121729442687591943.html?mod=blog

"Running to represent a mostly lower-middle-class district with just 11,000 registered voters," Sean Tevis "has raised more than $95,000. The astounding sum hasn't come from his neighbors, but from kindred spirits nationwide. Systems analysts, programmers and Web designers have showered him with donations in appreciation of his offbeat online fund-raising plea, which consists of a stick-figure comic strip Running for Office: It's Like a Flamewar With a Forum Troll, but With an Eventual Winner."

Re: Message from America? (#4)

There is a further illustration of this from the 2004 Election Cycle, where Georgia Democratic Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (now running as the Green Party's candidate for President), a long-time supporter of Palestinian rights, was defeated in the Democratic Primary by Denise Majette, 99% of whose funding came from New York-based Jewish organisations.

As it is now, we only have to give money to the Labour Party nationally through our membership subscription; should we choose to support individual candidates, whose policies we like, we can do so by sending a donation directly to their CLP.

Re: Message from America? (#5)

I'm a bit worried about poor Obama. So many expectations have been placed on his shoulders. People are expecting miracles that most mortal men can't deliver.

Politicians are not rock-stars at the end of the day. Instead they have the crappy job of deciding between the unpalatable and the unpleasant. obama made a mistake with his grand tour of Europe - it would have been fine after he was president (JKF made a similar tour after he became leader of the free world), but not before. I can't help thinking he is setting himself up for a fall.

I wish him luck of course but I will be holding my breath on Nov 4th. In many ways I wish the Dems had chosen Hillary. Whatever their faults, the Clintons are realists who know exactly how grim the world can be and they can still keep their heads despite the worst the world can throw at them. That equips them to deal with problems in a way Obama doesn't have.

Recently in the US, we've seen the Eliot Spitzer thing, where he was elected by over 70% of the vote and them promptly fell from grace because he couldn't live up to all the noble, "above politics" hype. Politicians can't be above politics, because they are politicians! duh!