What Labour does now

A lot of people are writing today about Gordon Brown's likely longevity after the Glasgow East by-election. But frankly, it doesn't matter whether Labour have Brown, Miliband or even draft Barack Obama to take us into the next General Election. The challenges remain the same, and time is short.

(writes Labourhome.org editor Alex Hilton for The Independent)


David Cameron isn't an overwhelming adversary. He isn't widely loved or trusted: he's not a Tony Blair circa 1996.

However, he is a good communicator and he is willing to sit back and take advantage of our failings. His lead in the polls is commanding, but it's still soft. People could come back to Labour if we give them a reason to do so.

It's the vision thing. Labour needs to show the country that we're not just focused on the next day's headlines: we need to be the purveyors of a vision of Britain in ten years time. There have already been glimpses of this. James Purnell's recently published green paper on welfare reform really does seek to tackle a long unaddressed problem in a compassionate manner. But where is the vision elsewhere in government?

We have large nettles to grasp on energy, pensions, social care, the cost of public sector services and the public perception of crime. If we look at an even broader perspective, we need to escalate social mobility and halt the decline of public engagement in politics.

And all these issues can be taken on simultaneously. None of these problems is unsolvable. With the right people, we could have plans ready in three months or so. We could decide that no more children will grow up in ghettos; we could invest in intelligence based policing; we could plan for an international renewable power grid; we could propose an electoral system where people's votes actually count.

Our withering democracy really is part of the problem. It is said that in Glasgow East, Labour hadn't canvassed voters for years, taking this safe seat for granted. This is what parties do in safe seats. Only exceptional MPs prioritise campaigning in safe seats because there are so many other things to do. We have a system that forces parties to focus their efforts on 50-100 seats, We have a system that tells people there's no point in voting if you don't live in one of those seats, a system that contributes to young people feeling they have no influence over the society to which they are subject.

It isn't just public democracy and engagement that is suffering. We need to get our own house in order inside the Labour Party. Our structures divorce members from the running of the party and from practically influencing policy; and the half-hearted attempts to use the internet to engage with members or the public are mostly risible.

We need to get back to our basic principles. We are the party of the people. We are the party that seeks to end poverty. Our message is inspirational, so let's stop messing around and get on with it.

Alex Hilton
alexhilton@gmail.com
07985 384 859


Display: Sort:

Re: What Labour does now (#1)

I agree it is the 'vision thing'.

I would say wee need to communicate and start to put into action three strands:

1. Westminster, while being the seat of sovereignty and scrutiny, should focus on fiscal (overall tax and spend), defence and national infrastructure (where the focus will change);

2. Europe should deal with market regulation, foreign and I would say monetary policy, in the context of global institutions;

3. Local government should deal with local public services, and get members involved with the very real difficulties of public policy, not as sometimes happens too many abstract utopian debates. 

These distinctions are not hard and fast, and in some ways there are signs of moving in this direction. The Tories seem to be saying Blairite policy but better implemented, but the world has moved on.

Re: What Labour does now (#3)

The one thing that might mitigate the drubbing Labour could get are the GE is to bring in PR asap; a fairer system. FPTP could result in a disproportionate number of seats being picked up by the Tories. Lets put all Parties on a level playing field, and make every vote or preference count. Unfortunately, the country is being bombarded by events and there is very little that the Govt can do but ride the tide until calmer waters are reached.

Re: What Labour does now (#2)

James Purnell's recently published green paper on welfare reform

If there's any one thing that lost us this by-election, it was that paper. Leaving aside whether it's any good or not (and it's not - it's certainly not "compassionate"), dumping on incapacity benefit claimants in the week of a by-election in a constituency with a high number of such claimants is just inept on a really fundamental level.

Re: What Labour does now (#4)

Is it not possible that in an area where 50% of the population is on benefits Purnell's welfare reform may have lost Glasgow East???

Re: What Labour does now (#5)

rosie - are you a Labour supporter?

Re: What Labour does now (#7)

Isn't that what I said?

Re: What Labour does now (#6)

LabourOutlook

Yes but not slavishly so. I voted for Blair and I don't like Brown.

Re: What Labour does now (#8)

Cameron is much brighter than Blair, and also has had a chance to learn from Blair's mistakes.  One of Gordon's many problems is that he totally under-estimates Cameron.

Re: What Labour does now (#9)

'brightness' in Politics won't win you many points; what will is 'likeability'. The fact is that half the Tory Party detest Cameron, personally, for what he is doing to traditional Tory values.