COMPASS: Nothing seems to change

The Glasgow East byelection result is another nail in the coffin of New Labour. Across the country, the electorate are crying out for change, they want a government that can help improve their lives. But a politics that is rooted in the 1990s has simply run out of answers. In response, the government once again claim they are listening, but things still seem unlikely to change; despite political wipe-out now staring Labour in the face.

This awful defeat vindicates what Compass has been saying for three years - that the coalition that brought Labour to power in 1997 has been shattered. Between 1997 and 2005, the party lost 4 million voters - and this time we saw a further pulling-away of the working-class vote that New Labour has always ill-advisedly taken for granted. Meanwhile, people across all classes and social groups are turning away from the party. Particularly in England the Tories are on the march; partly thanks to the sense that they are engaging with concerns that lie at the centre of people's lives.

Needless to say, Gordon Brown's stiff, remote style of leadership doesn't help. But there is a more fundamental political problem that is destroying the Labour Party. Even at a time when the credit crunch and rising prices mean that the post-Thatcher settlement is being questioned as never before, a supposedly progressive government refuses to address the way that the unrestrained free-market is damaging people's lives in no end of areas: from housing and rising fuel bills, to crippling consumer debt and insecurity at work, and on to the dysfunctional inequality that defines so many of the UK's current problems.

Others may be distracted by New Labour kremlinology, and the question of whether one of Brown's cabinet colleagues might somehow be persuaded to replace him. For us, there is no point in talking about such changes if the conversation isn't fundamentally about a change of direction that will revive people's confidence that the government is in touch with modern concerns, and in control of the forces that shape them.

There is little money left to spend and less than two years before the likely date of the next election, but that still leaves room for measures that would signal a change of direction and show that Labour understands the challenges of the 21st century. We would argue in favour of:

- A windfall tax on energy and oil companies to help those struggling with escalating fuel bills.
- A fairer tax system with a new top rate and a cut in taxes for the low paid with all new revenues ear marked to boost benefit levels for the poor. Some have suggested that those earning under £10,000 per year should pay no tax. This is clean, simple and very appealing.
- A new drive to build council houses. By 2010, 5 million people will need social housing, but this year, a start will be made on only 100,000 new homes. With private construction apparently in freefall, the state has to step in.
- A high-profile drive to improve people's working lives via government setting new standards. As a minimum, we need a new fair employment clause in all public contracts, to make sure that the public sector points the way out of the low pay culture that ensures - contrary to recent headlines about welfare reform - that work is still no guarantee of an exit from poverty. The government should take the lead of London and roll out a living wage nationwide in all public procurement contracts - which even Boris Johnson has raised in London in his first months in office.
- A moratorium on Post Office closures, and new protection for the universal service obligation of the Post Office.
- Abolishing the youth exemptions in the minimum wage.
- Help close the gender pay gap - with statutory pay audits for equality.
- Access to all local authority sports facilities free for children under 16 to confront the issues of obesity and anti-social behaviour head on.
- Across all these policy areas, if money is needed to deal with rising insecurity and anxiety then we should rethink the renewal of Trident and scrap the ID cards scheme. Government insiders claim that the latter is effectively being left to wither away, but where is the political advantage in that? On this, as with so many policies, a clear change has to be demonstrated.

Over the summer and beyond, Labour has to begin a conversation about all of this and take clear action, or face long years in the political wilderness. Compass intends to act as a catalyst for that process and play an active role in it.

Display: Sort:

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#1)

Brown is not going to carry oput any of the things you suggest. All the more reason to replace him, Cruddas for leader!

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#2)

One thing never changes: the endless supply of cack that comes out of Compass.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#3)

"Others may be distracted by New Labour kremlinology, and the question of whether one of Brown's cabinet colleagues might somehow be persuaded to replace him. For us, there is no point in talking about such changes if the conversation isn't fundamentally about a change of direction that will revive people's confidence that the government is in touch with modern concerns, and in control of the forces that shape them."

I haven't always agreed with Compass but this is spot on. And some good policy suggestions too.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#4)

A windfall tax on energy and oil companies??


From The Times of July 24, 2008, "Scottish & Southern Energy (SSE) issued a stark warning that its first-half profits would be substantially lower" or July 25, 2008, "British Gas, the UK's biggest supplier with 16 million customers, is expected to reveal a slump in profits".

Err, there aren't any windfall profits by energy companies to tax, since they've all had their margins squeezed by the increases in wholesale energy prices. Hence the expectation (confirmed today by EDF) that there is another round of double-digit price increases on the way.

As to the oil companies, GB has already taken his pound from flesh from North Sea Oil, and no matter how much money BP makes from pumping oil out of the ground in Alaska (for example), the tax it pays is matter for the US rather than the UK government.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#5)

"A windfall tax on energy and oil companies"

The left have got to learn that businesses are NOT a bottomless mine of gold that can be "piggy-banked" every time you run out of cash.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#6)

Big ones are.

Though personally I would eschew a windfall tax in favour of nationalisation without compensation.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#8)

"Big ones are.

Though personally I would eschew a windfall tax in favour of nationalisation without compensation."


That is where you go wrong. It is business that generates the wealth to provide salaries, taxes and corporate taxes that govt. needs to implement its programmes. If you nationalised everything you would destroy your tax base.

Drive companies out of profitibilty with windfall taxes and they are exempt from further taxes. Taxes are only levied on PROFITS.

Eventually you wind up in socialist utopia with everything nationalised and shortly thereafter you wind up in the history books together with all the regimes that tried that approach.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#9)

They seem to be driving themselves out of profits under this ludicrous and short-sighted Capitalist Utopia that has now found that it can no longer promise tomorrow today and which has to turn on itself and start feeding on its own kind now...

how long do you think people can withstand fuel costs that rise by nearly 60% in a year??? and if the fuel companies still post profits whilst charging people these extortionate prices there will be more unrest...

Capitalists have started painting themselves into their final corners - either they lose money and suffer, or post profits and cause outrage. 

Having a global economy run on the gambling whims of a few rich businessmen has always been an immoral way to run society - now it has shown once again that it is not even a safe way to run things... combined with the now probably irreversible drift into climate change these capitalist exploiters have forced upon us, it seems like the Capitalist Utopia could soon be winding us all up in the history books - except noone might be around to read them!

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#10)

"how long do you think people can withstand fuel costs that rise by nearly 60% in a year?"

It's tough, no doubt about it. I'm feeling the pinch just like everyone else and I've cut back on a lot. I regularly switch suppliers so that I stay as near the bottom of the pricing curve as I can manage.


"if the fuel companies still post profits whilst charging people these extortionate prices there will be more unrest..."

Taking BP as an example - their first quarter profit was £10bn but only 9% of this was from the UK. In other words, 91% of their profit was made OUTSIDE the UK and we all get to benefit - even you. Your pension will almost certainly be invested in BP, EDF, Shell, Centrica, etc, etc and these "excess" profits you moan about are going into YOUR pension and MY pension. Companies pay out to their shareholders and not to some fat man in pin stripes with a 2 foot cigar who uses peasants as footstools. If you want more of what BP et al makes then buy shares and you will share in those profits.

Anyone can participate - just walk into your bank (I presume you make use of those bastions of capitalism) and buy shares in these companies. Even the unions, who always mutter about having no influence in the boardroom, could buy shares and turn up at AGMs and demand action. Even better, the shares pay you back for buying them. Remember - the shareholders own the business and anyone can be a shareholder. Now there's equality for you!


"Capitalists have started painting themselves into their final corners - either they lose money and suffer, or post profits and cause outrage. "

Which puts them ahead of communists and socialists most of whom went bankrupt last century.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#11)

You forgot the legally required caveat - shares might go down as well as up... and at the moment anyone with excess money to invest in shares could well find they rapidly lose their value... again, the poorest people are unable to take part in this gambling lottery whilst those who can afford to lose money are the ones already ruining our world.

And how do I profit from BPs financial takings? My state pension is dependent on BP etc doing well?  So I must happily pay more for my fuel now to get my pension later?


Sounds a bit like the old income tax arguments... pay more tax now and secure better state pensions!

So, Socialsm = more tax now = secure pensions for everyone
Capitalism = higher bills now = secure pensions for private pensionholders

Yup, I can see the one I prefer!


Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#12)

"You forgot the legally required caveat - shares might go down as well as up"

I'm not regulated by the FSA!  ;-)


"and at the moment anyone with excess money to invest in shares could well find they rapidly lose their value"

So, put them in ISAs like the govt wants you to and those ISAs are, errr...., invested in the stock market.


"poorest people are unable to take part in this gambling lottery "

Unlike the National Lottery that many people dump their money in every week, investments actually pay back. They've no trouble participating in that one.


"My state pension is dependent on BP etc doing well?"

Yes indeed. Pension funds are MAJOR shareholders in all blue chip companies. You are profiteering from the energy companies you dirty capitalist ...  :-)

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#15)

It's worth pointing out that the increase in profits at oil companies like BP is not derived from forecourt petrol sales in the UK, the margin on which is pretty slim. The majority of the profit comes from exploration, extraction and, to a lesser extent, processing/refining.

Obviously most of those elements of the business take place outside the UK and, as has been pointed out, are subjet to tax in those countries. Given that BP dividends contribute £1 in every £10 to UK pension funds, your average Briton is already sharing in the company's success.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#13)

I can see the need for an explanation of Marxist economics to you, not to mention a history lesson on the pseudo-Marxist regimes of the past. But this thread probably isn't the time or place.

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#14)

"I can see the need for an explanation of Marxist economics to you, not to mention a history lesson on the pseudo-Marxist regimes of the past."

Well - start a new thread on it. 

Re: COMPASS: Nothing seems to change (#7)

"Nothing seems to change" sums up most of the replies on this thread.
Despite spending £billions on educatiion, it would appear basic economics (i.e. sums) have not been taught to Labour Supporters. Or the lessons have not been learned.

Stop taxing, spend more wisely.

But hey some people never learn. See Gordon Brown.