The American reality is currently only a dream

A copy of 'America goes to the polls - a report (pdf) on voter turnout in the 2008 Presidential Primary' has just landed in my inbox.  As might be expected, there are some real wow stats:

1) More than one in four of all eligible voters participated in a primary or caucus. This is a rate not seen since 1972, when the voting age was lowered to 18.


2) Voter participation in Democratic primaries was up 112% and caucuses by 223% compared to 2004 - ie.the turnout in Democratic primaries doubled and tripled in the caucuses.


3) Youth participation rose at a faster rate than any other age group. Turnout by voters ages 18-29 went up for the third consecutive national election year (2004 and 2006).


But alongside these startling facts, there is a salient message: besides competitive elections (which are very important) or the date of the primary (weekday / weekend), a number of factors influenced voter turnout. Election Day Registration and Early Voting most likely contributed to higher turnout in many states.

"Election Day Registration (EDR): Allowing voters to register or fix their registration at the polls ensures that more voters can successfully participate. Of the states with some form of Election Day Registration, most held caucuses. The three states with primaries, Wisconsin, New Hampshire and North Carolina, had high participation. Voters in North Carolina, normally a lower turnout state, benefited from the state letting early voters to register and vote at the same time up until 3 days before the election."
"Early Voting: Allowing voters more and better opportunities to vote early can raise turnout in contests with traditionally lower turnout, like primaries3. Four of the ten states with the highest 2008 voter turnout - Oregon, Illinois, Florida and California - have broad early voting systems in place."
Maybe both are measures the Ministry of Justice should be more seriously considering within its Governance of Britain discussions and consultations, rather than just the tinkering round the edges that constitute its proposals on weekend voting and giveaways at polling stations.


And perhaps the main lesson to take away from the report is that:

"The 2008 election provides fresh evidence of the difference made by meaningful competition and a diverse field of candidates and the higher levels of voter mobilization and participation this engenders."
Meaningful competition. A diverse field of candidates.  Very few voters actually experience that at an election here.  The MoJ really needs to start looking at ways of encouraging such circumstances.  And that means public consultation and action on a number of factors, including our voting system.



Display: Sort:

Re: The American reality (#1)

Are the stats really all that good?  Whatever the scale of the improvement on 2004, why did turnout still only exceed a third of all eligible voters in 10 out of the 36 states where both parties had primaries?

eg. the fact that less than one in five people in New York State voted in the primary might suggest that the competition wasn't as "meaningful" or the candidates as "diverse" as the voters would have liked!