How long must we endure this agony?

Are there really people out there who think Gordon Brown should continue to lead the Labour Party? I find it hard to believe.

As I have said before I do think Gordon is a decent man and is driven by decent values - after all he spent most of the last 11 years attempting to radically reduce poverty both here and in the developing world.

But he is just out of his depth as Prime Minister and that is damaging all of us in the Labour Party and, ultimately, the country.

Britain needs a Labour government but with Gordon in charge we aren't going to have one for very much longer. We need a new leader who will at least give us a fighting chance in a general election.

Three stories in the last week illustrate why we have to summon up the courage and ask, or force, Gordon to leave.

Firstly: the food fiasco. The issue here is not, as Colin Byrne and Lance Price have suggested, the foolishness of saying eat your crusts and then toddling off for an 18 course meal. For sure that indicates people employed in the machine cannot do their job. But the real issue is a deeper one - that the Prime Minister thinks it is his job to make speeches at any time denouncing this or that eating habit. That big state mentality just isn't where the voters are at.

Secondly, the stories that No 10 runs its own whipping operation in parallel to the real one. This just illustrates a deep problem with Gordon Brown's political praxis. Like Thatcher you are either for him or you are the enemy within. Gordon has absolute control over who is in the whips office but still has to run his own little, presumably meant to be secret, operation. It is a lack of collegiality that means he isn't up to being leader.

Thirdly, Cameron's amazing speech blaming the poor for their poverty. This ought to be political dynamite. Every Labour minister ought to be referring to it in every speech and at every public occasion. But I don't think I have heard one even mention it in passing - and that is a symptom of how the party machine is fundamentally and irretrievably broken under Mr Brown. It's not about money, it is about simple political understanding and having the guts and energy to fightback against the Tories.

I really believe the Tories can be beaten. I think Cameron's arrogance is beginning to show through and the fact that he hasn't got a single coherent policy except to bring back fox hunting and he has never run anything bigger than a TV company's PR office make him very vulnerable to a short sharp attack.

But we also have to be honest. People have decided they don't want Gordon as Prime Minister and they are prepared to take the gamble on Cameron.

If we don't act then we are culpable in letting that happen.



Display: Sort:

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#1)

I don’t know who you are, lulu, but this is the third anti Brown story you’ve posted. You’ve never written or posted on any other subject other than on a purely anti-brown rant. Your positively partisan rants show up the major flaw in Alex’s plan for LabourHome. There’s no possible process by which it is possible to filter out the crazy antagonists or nutters; I’m sure you fit into at least one of these categories.

 

Firstly: Gordon’s advisors are morons; this seems incontrovertible. They have led him from crisis to crisis. Gordon must learn to trust his instincts and get rid of these ‘fair weather’ advisors. There are people who can advise him well and they are closer than he knows.

 

Secondly: Brogan may be right about this but this may only be a natural symptom of the insular nature of being Prime Minister. There does seem to be a coterie around ministers and senior members of the Government which makes it difficult for them to connect to the real world. There is no evidence that this is either new or unique.

 

Thirdly: Cameron’s speech was neither seminal or ‘amazing’, it was just another in a long series of “you’re poor because you’re stupid” speeches that stupidly rich people make from time to time.

 

Thank you lulu for presuming that I don’t want Gordon Brown to lead us into the next election (I’m presuming you’ll lump me in with all the other people you’ve canvassed). But forgive me if I have a different point of view.

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#2)

What on earth makes you think that it's Gordon's advisers who have led him from crisis to crisis?  Gordon doesn't really take advice.  And he picked all these people. What kind of leader picks advisers who are "morons" and then follows their advice?

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#3)

Hi, 'lulu,' I have to ask: with such wonderfully depressing headline writing skills, have you ever thought about a career in local journalism?

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#4)

I want Cruddas as leader, he is our only hope.

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#5)

You must be joking! Can you see anybody other than working-class Cockneys wanting him as PM because I can't!

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#6)

Does anyone really believe that pontificating over who should be Prime Minister when we already have a Labour Prime Minister does anything other than allow the media to point out that Labour "activists" are already talking about the demise of a Labour Leader.

Stop it, it is not big and it is not clever.

Re: How long must we endure this agony? (#7)

Oh, and then we might go, say, 22 points behind the polls?

 

The point is not the media, but the country. The country has made up its mind. A "won't someone think of the children" approach isn't going to alter that fact.

I want to beat the Tories - into the ground if possible, but by one vote if that's all that's on offer. Yet right now we are heading for disaster.