NHS 60: How do we improve our health service?
The health service, for all its faults, is much better than 11 years ago.
Waiting lists are down from an average of 18 months, to 4-6 weeks. The infrustructure of the hospital buildings, and clinics have dramatically improved in some areas. Cancer and heart deaths are down. Funding has made a real difference, and the NHS is undoubtedly better with 78,000 more nurses and 20,000 more doctors.
There have been some great reforms, some I'm not supportive of. I support the latest polyclinic plan, which can make a real difference in poorer areas. I don't mind if the state picks up the tab for private operations, as long as my gran gets the same treatment as a duchess. However, foundation hospitals may have led to middle-class areas creaming off funding.
Another greatreform of this government, is that they didn't divert funding to poorer peforming hospitals. This has meant that poorer wings and hospitals have to close. However bad in the short term, it is the long term right decision.
The government announced that quality, and not money or quantity would define funding yesterday. The particular problem with the cleaning industry, is that its marketisation has led to funding being directed on the issue of cost, rather than quality.
This is the greatness of the constitution. Rather than inciting people to fall for wonder drugs, it ends the postcode lottery by allowing people to demand any drug that NICE recommends. It needs more than £100 mn to ease the costs, but its a start.
The issue of choice doesn't weaken the roots of the NHS in the latest reforms. Everyone now has a legal right to choose their GP and hospital.
For those who say we need to change our funding structure, it is important to know that countries like France and the US are moving towards our funding structures.
It is more cost effective, as the Tories found when they wanted to abolish the NHS in the '50's, as public and private costs combined took up less of GDP. Ironically, the same things were said then: an ageing population, galloping technological advance and rising public expectations make the NHS unsustainable.
The NHS is in good health. 10 years ago, it needed serious operating on. But there are no more defecits, no more annual crises, and no more winter ward closures. Avoidable death rates show a 23% improvement-in the years of 1998-2003, before the big Labour spend.
Waiting lists are down from an average of 18 months, to 4-6 weeks. The infrustructure of the hospital buildings, and clinics have dramatically improved in some areas. Cancer and heart deaths are down. Funding has made a real difference, and the NHS is undoubtedly better with 78,000 more nurses and 20,000 more doctors.
There have been some great reforms, some I'm not supportive of. I support the latest polyclinic plan, which can make a real difference in poorer areas. I don't mind if the state picks up the tab for private operations, as long as my gran gets the same treatment as a duchess. However, foundation hospitals may have led to middle-class areas creaming off funding.
Another greatreform of this government, is that they didn't divert funding to poorer peforming hospitals. This has meant that poorer wings and hospitals have to close. However bad in the short term, it is the long term right decision.
The government announced that quality, and not money or quantity would define funding yesterday. The particular problem with the cleaning industry, is that its marketisation has led to funding being directed on the issue of cost, rather than quality.
This is the greatness of the constitution. Rather than inciting people to fall for wonder drugs, it ends the postcode lottery by allowing people to demand any drug that NICE recommends. It needs more than £100 mn to ease the costs, but its a start.
The issue of choice doesn't weaken the roots of the NHS in the latest reforms. Everyone now has a legal right to choose their GP and hospital.
For those who say we need to change our funding structure, it is important to know that countries like France and the US are moving towards our funding structures.
It is more cost effective, as the Tories found when they wanted to abolish the NHS in the '50's, as public and private costs combined took up less of GDP. Ironically, the same things were said then: an ageing population, galloping technological advance and rising public expectations make the NHS unsustainable.
The NHS is in good health. 10 years ago, it needed serious operating on. But there are no more defecits, no more annual crises, and no more winter ward closures. Avoidable death rates show a 23% improvement-in the years of 1998-2003, before the big Labour spend.
But, we need a new vision. What should it be?
I would like to hear your ideas.
The Tories used to mock Labour on one particualr point about the NHS: "They promised it would make us healthier."
Why not correct that?
I think the new vision should be on making sure that there is less strain through unhealthiness.
Already, a smoking ban has seen admissions for heart attacks go down by 3%. Over a quarter of smokers have given up. This will make long term savings.
Why not ban advertising for alcohol? Furthermore, ban under 21's from buying alcohol, and end the era of cheap supermarket alcohol. This would not only see less admissions for violence, but in the long term for diseases like Cirrhosis.
We're facing an obesity crisis, so why not introduce universal and compulsory free school meals?
I hope you can all give me some more examples.
I think we should have less reform, and more cash for more midwives, and nurses and doctors and cleaners. We should have the Dutch model for infection. We should phase out prescription charges, and NHS parking costs. We need to sort out NHS dentistry.
What do you think we should do?
I would like to hear your ideas.
The Tories used to mock Labour on one particualr point about the NHS: "They promised it would make us healthier."
Why not correct that?
I think the new vision should be on making sure that there is less strain through unhealthiness.
Already, a smoking ban has seen admissions for heart attacks go down by 3%. Over a quarter of smokers have given up. This will make long term savings.
Why not ban advertising for alcohol? Furthermore, ban under 21's from buying alcohol, and end the era of cheap supermarket alcohol. This would not only see less admissions for violence, but in the long term for diseases like Cirrhosis.
We're facing an obesity crisis, so why not introduce universal and compulsory free school meals?
I hope you can all give me some more examples.
I think we should have less reform, and more cash for more midwives, and nurses and doctors and cleaners. We should have the Dutch model for infection. We should phase out prescription charges, and NHS parking costs. We need to sort out NHS dentistry.
What do you think we should do?
NHS 60: How do we improve our health service? | 10 comments (10 topical)
NHS 60: How do we improve our health service? | 10 comments (10 topical)


