The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell

John McDonnell has announced that he is boycotting the Compass conference this weekend over leading Compass MPs' support for 42 days legislation.  Yet he ignores the fact that it was his own Socialist Campaign Group MPs that made the key difference to the vote.


McDonnell wrote: "I was scheduled to speak at the Compass conference on Saturday at the LRC/ Labour Briefing breakout session. I will not do so now. I do not want to be associated with those that are willing to support undermining the basic human rights that socialists have fought and sacrificed themselves to secure and protect over generations."

Well guess what - NINE paid up Socialist Campaign Group MPs voted with the Government:

John Austin
Michael Clapham
Ann Cryer
Bill Etherington
David Hamilton
Austin Mitchell
Dennis Skinner
David Taylor
Bob Wareing

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7448372.stm#labour
http://www.scgn.org.uk/

So is John going to boycott future Campaign Group meetings as well? Before he starts walking out of other people's conferences, he should look closer to home.

McDonnell is the Secretary of the Campaign group, yet if these 9 MPs had opposed the Government, this legislation would have been clearly defeated. His blame of Compass for this mirrors the debate that followed his failure to convince his own Campaign Group MPs to nominate him for the leadership. An inconvenient truth he failed to address then and one I doubt he will address now. 


Display: Sort:

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#1)

I was both surprised and pleased to see that John's / the LRC's immediate press release was not a sectarian rant against the Compass MPs, although of course the emails on various lists from his office staff did blame Compass.

But this thread highlights a key point...I think those who voted against the government were correct in doing so. But it's very difficult to lay blame at the door of Compass when the Campaign Group does not have the discipline to support its Chair... 

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#6)

The Inconvenient Truth for COMPASS  and Henry G is that its 2 KEY MPs voted against a  policy which COMPASS  has been actively campaigning  on for  weeks - utterly  undermined  its credibility. Were any of the 37 rebels associated with  COMPASS?  

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#25)

So one roughly one third of the oh-so-ideologically-pure Socialist Campaign Group voted with the government.

I know it's much easier for you to scapegoat Jon Cruddas and Jon Trickett, but don't you think that this may indicate the issue is not as black and white as you make out?

It's just like when McDonnell didn't make it on the ballot paper. He couldn't even persuade all the SGC MPs to nominate him, but out of the entire PLP, it was clearly all Jon Cruddas's fault...

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#27)

No, it was Cruddas's fault (and other Compass MPs')because he did a deal and reneged on it.

The Campaign Group is a useless shell and all socialists in the Labour Party know it.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#28)

The problem I have with the Cruddas campaign is that it claimed to support a platform of socialist policies, but then backed Brown over McDonnell - having said they would nominate McDonnell. Likewise, Compass never asked its members who they backed for leader.

The Campaign Group contains a core of about 15-20 or so members, the others are more peripheral - people can work that out from voting records.

Most SCG members (20/24) did back John's leadership candidacy, the four exceptions being John Austin, David Hamilton, Bob Marshall-Andrews (who has since publicly stated he regrets nominating Brown), and Chris Mullin.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#29)

Chris Mullin isn't in the Campaign Group. He was before he joined the government, but he didn't rejoin it when he returned to the backbenches.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#26)

Emily Thornberry

and to a lesser extent

John Grogan
Dai Havard

I think we are all getting overly vexed attacking each other. It's turning a bit Life of Brian with LRC as the Judean People's front and Compass as the People Front of Judea (splitters). Let's try and remember who the real enemy is, the Romans of course.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#34)

Is this what 'convinced' Jon Trickett to vote with the Government?

http://www.hemsworthandsouthelmsallexpress.co.uk/news/A1-Link-Road-decision-announced.2035834.jp

A new road for his constituency . . ? 

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#35)

"Is this what 'convinced' Jon Trickett to vote with the Government?

http://www.hemsworthandsouthelmsallexpress.co.uk/news/A1-Link-Road-decision-announced.2035834.jp

A new road for his constituency . . ?"

Disgusting

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#38)

It actually looks like that article is several months old, yet comes up on Google News as published within the last few days. Whatever it was that made Trickett vote for 42 it wasn't the A1.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#2)

I still firmly believe that John is making a mistake. He may be angry at those MPs who voted with the government - and he's right, they were totally wrong - but I'm sure that many, many ordinary Compass members were opposed to 42 day detention. What he is doing is like blaming ordinary members of Compass for the failure of their MPs. At the Compass Conference who would be his audience? John Cruddas? No, ordinary Compass activists.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#3)

It is the case that we need a forum in which the left and centre-left can talk eg compass and LRC, as well as left wing trade unionists.  I have setup a facebook called Labour Trade Union Progresssive Actvists it has admin from LRC and compass members and so far has 250 members or so since launching earlier this week.  We also have input from the NDP and democrats from the states and some colleagues who were once in the party and want to stay engaged in the process.  Lee Skevington CLP secretary in Yeovil is the secretary, Philip Lewis from Unison and the LRC, gives TULO input, compass youth as well as members from the socialist youth network are getting involved.  The youth delegate from the Democrats National Committee is also wanting to get involved.  This is a chance for all of us on the centre-left and left to talk informally, use the forum!!  A new website is on the way.

Lets talk and not score political points of each other.

Thanks

John Wiseman
Founder
LTUPA founder

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#4)

Sorry, check Hansard not the BBC. Bob Wareing rebelled, and David Taylor voted in both lobbies - a way of abstaining while showing you're there.

So the Campaign Group breakdown (still bad in my view) is 16 against 42 days, 7 for it and 1 abstention.

Aside from Cruddas and Trickett - anyone know any other Compass MPs?

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#19)

Well I would consider Thornberry, Grogan, Cousins, Naysmith, Farrelly and Burden in their general milieu...wouldn't you?

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#21)

I genuinely don't know. What does in their "general milieu" mean? The question is do they consider themselves to be Compass?
My understanding is that Compass in Parliament doesn't have paid-up members or a regularly meeting caucus within Parliament.
Does anyone have any insight as to who will now lead for them in Parliament since Jon Trickett has resigned?

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#5)

"I do not want to be associated with those that are willing to support undermining the basic human rights that socialists have fought and sacrificed themselves to secure and protect over generations."

Will he be leaving the Party then?

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#7)

This is completely incomparable.

John Trickett and Jon Cruddas are the two parliamentary representatives of Compass. They are effectively two of its leaders.

The Chair of the Campaign Group, John McDonnell, and all the key Campaign Group figures - and indeed the overall majority of the Group - voted against the Government.

Other than Emily Thornberry, I'm not aware of any MPs in the Compass milieu who voted against the Government. Indeed, in practice, Compass don't actually have a parliamentary group.

Compass are now an organisation in crisis because two of its leaders defied the overwhelming opinion of progressives by voting to repeal civil liberties that were fought for at much cost over generations or indeed centuries - and the suspicion that they (as other MPs) were bought off is widespread and will never, ever go away.

In other words they no longer have credible spokespeople and the political influence of Compass - over such a key, defining issue - has been shown to be nil.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#8)

John Grogan - Compass, rebelled.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#9)

One  out  of  37 - fantastic

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#10)

Owen just pointed out Emily Thornberry as well...

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#11)

That's two - and only two in a vague milieu. As I say, there isn't a Compass parliamentary group in practice. Grogan might have a friendly relationship with Compass but I think to try to sell him as some sort of  'Compass MP' is rather stretching the truth.

The key fact is the two parliamentary leaders of Compass - Trickett and Cruddas - voted for 42 days. They are de facto Compass in Parliament and outweighs the fact one or two other MPs on good terms with the organisation voted against 42 days.

I'd also be interested to know how much Emily Thornberry was encouraged to vote against 42 days by the fact she has a wafer thin majority over the Liberal Democrats.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#17)

Emily has been totally consistent on this. As far as I know, she felt it was simply unsupportable. She has in the past talked about the impact on a Muslim community if it's young men can be spirited away for six weeks without being told the charge against them.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#18)

Considering you work in Parliament it's surprising you leave this open to question.

Of course Emily took a principled stand against this.

Why question her motives?

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#12)

I'd also like to ask Compass supporters how they think the credibility of their two leaders will ever be recovered because:

a) They voted to repeal civil liberties that were fought for at huge cost (including people's lives) over centuries in favour of the longest period of detention in the Western world;

b) They defied the overwhelming majority of progressive opinion in doing so;

c) The suspicion that they (or Trickett at the least - I'm sure Cruddas would have voted for it anyway) were bought off is widespread and will never go away.

This wasn't some controversial "hard left" issue. It was about opposing the most regressive legislation in the Western world with no evidence in support of it which was pushed purely in order to prolong the death agony of Brown's frankly embarrassing premiership.

Sort of leaves their reputations in tatters, surely?

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#13)

I repeat that this not a time for ripping into each other the new labour project is stumbling and the left and centre left could be stronger than ever. It is a fact that both the compass MPS and socialist campaign group have questions to answer eg all should have rebelled like John and others have said.  We should work together.  There is many in the LRC and compass who would have voted against.  I would say to Henry G, Susan and Owen we can't afford this debating, we have to be strong and lets keep talking

John Wiseman
PPC Westmorland and Lonsdale

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#14)

Have to agree with John here; the results suggest that most politicians - not all - are pretty rubbish whatever their  allegiances.

It's a small glsshouse on the left no matter where you align so we'd better not start throwing too many stones else we're liable to bring it all down.

What will be critical is hearing the rationale from all the 'left' MPs who supported the bill.

BTW did you all here about the new coMPass vodka - bottled in Westminster? It's so popluar it has a 42 waiting list :) 

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#15)

I don't agree with Cruddas or Trickett on this occasion. They essentially voted for this messy piece of legislation, because it was messy, and because it would be held up. I don't care it it means little in practise, if the sentiment of the bill is to indicate how 'tough on terror' we really are, or to appeal to the Sun, then I'm against it. The government wasted valuable time, when they could've debated the real ways of defeating terrorism. Lets list them:

1) Concentrating their efforts on allowing wire-tap evidence in court.

2) Ending their role in the war of drugs, which would allow Afghanistan to build up their economy.

3) Withdrawing funds from the World Bank until they clean up their act, which would give economic independence to Iraq, and allow them to have a more beefed up co-operative in the oil industry. It is the lack of a Marshall plan in Iraq that is serving as a breeding ground for fascism.

4) Start mediating efforts for multilateral non-proliferation. Particuarly in Kashmir, which would do more to de-stabilise Al-Qaeda than a peace process in Israel.

5) Declare support for free Kashmir, Chechnya, and Palestine.

6) Concentrating on energy independence, which would allow us to force pressure on countries with oil supplies that abuse human rights.

7) Help Muslim women and democrats and gays, so as to help defeat fundamentalism.

8) Having a commitment to secularism, and a clean arms policy.

We need a general commitment to being anti-tyranny. In many dictatorial countries, who we arm, the only opposition movement is that of Islamic fundamentalists e.g. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Uzbekistan etc. Muslim democrats, many of whom are comrades on the left are being driven into the hands of these clerical madmen. The motives are more often than not, about oil.

Similarly, despite all the terrorism, the fight for a free Chechnya or Palestine is a noble one. The foundations of these ideologies are Islamic fundamentalism, but it is layered with opposition to the Russians, or Israelis killing their fellow countrymen.

The first nuclear war, if we are not careful, will be between India and Pakistan. Nearly a fifth of the world's population live in these two countries. Only efforts to start multilateral disarmament can quell jihadism in Iran and Pakistan.

Drugs fuels every terrorist group. The FARC, the Taliban etc. Even loyalist and republican paramilitaries still left in Northern Ireland, who are stoking up sectarian attitudes amongst the young, gain their finances through drugs. Does anyone think that if we left Afghanistan alone, that Hamid Karzai wouldn't legalise 60-70% of his economy?

The World Bank spreads Thatcherism on steroids economics across the world, through blackmail. They destroyed Russia and Argentina, leaving Russia vunerable to that Soviet-fundamentalist Vladimir Putin. Some countries bravely fight back. The Bolivians refused to have their water companies privatised, because it would have trebled water bills, leaving many without clean water. The World Bank also controls an economy of a country lead by a man who is the leader of a party (Jalal Talabani-Patriotic Union of Kursitan), that is a member of the Socialist International. Iraq has snippets of a co-operative hydrocarbon law, and without the World Bank on their backs, it would be a properly co-operative law, which would allow Iraq (now estimated to be the country with either the first or second biggest oil supplies) to build up their economy. They could reverse the regression that has hit healthcare, education, and its water, electricity and sanitation systems. They could build roads (as could the Afghans). It is their economic depletion which has caused jihadism. If Britain had massive unemployment, especially amongst young, bored, and frustrated men, then it wouldn't be long before Blacks and Whites and Asians started turning on each other.


Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#16)

Jon Trickett has resigned as the Compass PLP Chair. 

www.compassonline.org.uk

Pushed rather than jumped my sources are telling me....

Good riddance! 

Thornberry or Grogan would make fitting replacements.

Let's hope Cruddas reflects on what he did last night and can save himself. 

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#20)

Bob Wareing is no longer a Labour MP - having resigned the whip last year - and voted against extended pre-charge detention in last night's vote.

The Guardian seem to have made a mistake by noticing his absence from the list of Labour rebels issued by the Press Association, and assuming that because he rebelled over 90 days then he must have backed the government. The reason he wasn't on the list of Labour rebels of last night is that he's no longer a Labour MP.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#31)

Good riddance to Belgrade Bob....

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#22)

Well guess what - NINE paid up Socialist Campaign Group MPs voted with the Government: John Austin, Michael Clapham, Ann Cryer, Bill Etherington, David Hamilton, Austin Mitchell, Dennis Skinner, David Taylor, Bob Wareing


Wareing isn't a Lab MP anymore.
Taylor voted in both lobbies (his way to show an abstantion instead of just not being present). Austin and Etherington didn't vote.
The remaining 5 Campaign Groupers (Cryer, Clapham, Hamilton, Mitchell and Skinner) voted in favour of the 42 days proposals.

Press reports quoted Mitchell saying he has voted for it "to save Brown for the nation. If he had lost, he would have been on his way out". "

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#30)

Press reports quoted Mitchell saying he has voted for it "to save Brown for the nation. If he had lost, he would have been on his way out". "

If this vote was lost there may well have been a vote of no confidence and he knew that his PLP wouldn't risk that now.  We've got stop this sort of legislation ever getting this far and we need some brave MPs to never cave in again come what may, and for Brown to know that.

I say to the left PLP sheep: you may have saved your skins in this battle but you've lost the war now. You no longer represent me.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#23)

That seems more like it.  The Campaign Group have always had a few eccentrics in them. 

Cryer has become increasingly right wing recently, Mitchell is all over the place, the other three are a bit of a dissapointment but four Campaign Group MP's nominated Brown instead of McDonnell. 


There are a few left wingers outside the Group that have better voting records than some in it.  


I have tried to find a list of Compass MP's.  Can anyone provide me with one?


Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#32)

I don't think that there is one. Compass is a very, very loose group of MPs as has been said.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#24)

That seems more like it.  The Campaign Group have always had a few eccentrics in them. 

Cryer has become increasingly right wing recently, Mitchell is all over the place, the other three are a bit of a dissapointment but four Campaign Group MP's nominated Brown instead of McDonnell. 


There are a few left wingers outside the Group that have better voting records than some in it.  


I have tried to find a list of Compass MP's.  Can anyone provide me with one?


Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#33)

Dear comrades

As somebody in a stake in the four wings of the left and centre-left

1 Trade Union Movement
2 Co-op movement
3 LRC
4 Compass

I say this

Get your arses in gear and make sure we work togther and stop this political sniping, it is personalities overs substance.

Get a grip

John Wiseman

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#36)

It certainly is not personalities over substance. It's about core socialist values and who stands up for them. Personalities are irrelevant.

Re: The Inconvenient Truth for John McDonnell (#37)

e10 it is not yourself in particular, the left have always ripped itself a part at times.  I am determined it doesn't happen again!

John