Why Labour must take on the far-right

The piece below also appears on the Guardian's Comment is Free section

Patrick Barkham's report in today’s Guardian on the support for the far-right in Stoke-on-Trent well illustrates the need for Labour to strengthen its appeal to the white working-classes as well as to middle England. The increase in levels of support for the BNP raises all sorts of questions about how progressive politics deals with the rise of the far-right in Britain. Gordon Brown has argued that we need to do whatever we can to tackle xenophobia and racial hatred from wherever it surfaces. He is right, of course, but the key question is how is this best achieved?

One way to begin is to stop simply talking about the symptoms of dissatisfaction and address some of the underlying causes that have resulted in an increasing number of traditional Labour supporters taking refuge in the policies of the far-right. For example one reason for the growing support for the BNP has been its ability to respond to and exploit genuine local grievances. As Patrick Barkham’s piece makes clear, the BNP is often successful in so called 'forgotten' white areas, areas where many traditional Labour supporters frequently say that they feel alienated from modern political discourse and have long been of the view that no one in the Labour party is listening to them let alone concerned about them. The BNP often finds support in a context of significant social problems: high unemployment, deprivation, lack of educational achievement, high crime rates, drugs, and people of different ethnic backgrounds living apparently separate lives which encourages the growth of myths and rumour.

The BNP tactic is to use this information to focus on people who traditionally have voted Labour and in many cases feel neglected by this government. Many of these people feel that they have only two places they can go. One is not to vote, the other is to vote for the far-right. I think it is true to argue that all too often there is a lack of what might be described as a 'safe space' for ordinary working people to air their feelings - they often struggle to find the language to say what they want without being thought of or even accused of being a racist. In cities like Stoke-on-Trent the BNP is developing a network of supporters who are now openly willing to admit to not only voting for a racist and bigoted political party, but are doing so with pride and patriotic fervour.

If Labour is to stage a credible fight back then it must not only focus on the needs of the middle classes. Gordon Brown would send out a powerful message to his party’s core supporters if he were to personally throw his weight behind a call for a new ‘coalition of the willing’ that will help to blunt the advance of the far-right in this country by addressing some of the genuine concerns of white working-class voters whilst at the same time openly challenging those concerns that have no factual or legitimate basis. Brown should back calls for the creation of a multi-racial, multi-faith and cross-party movement that can help unite and lead the great majority of people in Britain who feel repulsed by the rhetoric and actions of the likes of the BNP.

Gordon Brown should explain that the reasons for Labour openly taking on the bigots and the bullies of the far-right are not purely tactical and strategic. He should make it clear that the values that underpin the Labour movement demand that it be done.





















Display: Sort:

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#1)

Exactement. The grievances of many, are with the supposed effect immigration has on housing, public services, and wages.

1) Repeal the Racial and Religious Hatred act. Let people see that they're voting for a party whose leader has declared Mein Kampf as his Bible.

2) Confront Littlejohnian lies. No. Only 5% of council houses are given to people who are foreign born, but it's still disgraceful that the waiting lists have risen. No. Police officers have said asylum seekers commit no more, no less crime.

3) Council housing, council housing, council housing.

4) Either increase the minimum wage, or introduce some form of industrial democracy.

5) We must recognise concerns over multiculturalism. End funding for religious schools.

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#3)

I thought it was John Tyndall who said "Mein Kampf is my bible"? Nevertheless Griffin is an evil nazi f*ckwit.

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#2)

Whilst policy is a vital weapon in the fight against the BNP, it's important not to forget organisation. Sometimes I think it's too easy for us to think that a policy announcement on council housing, for example, will instantaneously vanquish support for the neo-fascists.

The Guardian piece on Stoke-on-Trent demonstrated how BNP activists are able to portray themselves as "community champions" - taking part in local events, always propagandising, recruiting new members. And Labour Party membership in an area which has been Labour-controlled for years is pathetic.


We need dynamism in our party. And of course we need to be attracting new members (and keeping old ones) to make sure we have people putting forward Labour's case on the ground. Cabinet ministers who would like to see Labour as a "virtual party" or who think it is scaremongering to be worried about the collapse in membership should be tarred and feathered!


Well-trained and well-motivated full-time party organisers can make a huge difference. Of course the party is strapped for cash at the moment, but professional organisers on the ground should always be a priority for funding IMO.


Anti-fascist tactics are not always especially effective. When people are proud to display their support for the BNP and when BNP councillors are clearly not neo-Nazi thugs it is pointless to try to label all BNP voters as racist extremists. Noisy anti-fash demonstrators screaming at the top of their voices about Nick Griffin being a Hitlerite do not make a positive impact on the streets of places like Stoke-on-Trent. The kind of anti-fascist protesters who complain about anyone displaying the Union Jack even get on my nerves and I'm a loyal Labour leftie!

We need more subtle and more refined ways of campaigning in these areas. Searchlight has done some good work on this.

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#4)

I do agree to a large extent, but I think the very fact that many of the people voting BNP AREN'T nazis is a reason to expose the fact that the party is.  Frankly a hell of a lot of the councillors are, and the leadership is across the board.  With some voters who have cast their vote for the BNP either has a kind of spoilt ballot paper (a collective up yours to the political class) or through a sort of misplaced patriotism, I have found a straightforward exposition of the party's Nazi connections very effective.  Nick Griffin quotations can generally turn off non-Nazi BNP voters like a lightswitch (references to the 'holohoax', etc.)

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#5)

Very true, but we can expose their Naziism more effectively. Currently they can portray themselves as concerned about immigration. Nazi propaganda, of course. But the BNP have been able to mobolise so effectively, because the Labour party's grassroots has collapsed.

I have a suspision, that the Old Labour myth of Brown kept some voters. Our core vote thought that Brown would be a change. But now they have come under the impression (perhaps worryingly), that Labour will never change. The electorate is not moving to the right, as some have said. It is that our core constituency, now Cameron is the Tory leader, can genuinely see no difference. They believe that they may as well give Labour a kicking, because they feel betrayed.

We need to win back the council estates, and the other former hotbeds of Labour support, because only then can we mobilise ourselves into a grassroots party. I have one solution that on the surface, is not appealing. State funding: ask at the bottom of every tax form, whether people would like to donate £3 to the local party of their choice.

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#6)

Hahaha.

What tax form? The P46? You think anyone is going to tick Yes?

Re: Why Labour must take on the far-right (#7)

Well, I've been arguing for pure OMOV in Labour elections. Some have argued against me, saying that removing the right of non-party members voting would be the death of Labour. If the sentiment of these statements are true, perhaps I can be proved wrong, in that all of the trade unionists of the affiliated unions would donate to us. There are around 200,000 members who I assume would donate. So I assume SOMEONE will tick yes.