Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy...

Most of the below is from my blog, but I thought since Labourhome seems to have been a victom of some Tory trolling on this issue, this might be a helpful antidote...


I've been up in Crewe this weekend, enjoying the weather, Harvey's sandwich shop and helping out in the campaign - and oh so unsurprisingly, there's a lot of handwringing from the press about the campaign.
It's a load of rubbish, of course, but that doesn't seem to stop them recycling tory attack lines.

In a funny sort of way I've got respect for the Mail on Sunday, the Telegraph et al. They have an agenda - to attack New Labour with any weapons they can find - and if attacking the Labour campaign is part of that, well that's what they do. no point whining about it.


After all, being lectured by Quentin "Gorbals Mick" Letts about the evils of class warfare is at least amusing. The man clearly has no scruples.
So I don't mind that. If the right wing press weren't attacking us for our campaign they'd be attacking us for something else. 'Twas ever thus.

No, what gets my goat is how respectable, nice lefties recycle this nonsense in national newspaper columns as if it were gospel truth.

Let's review the facts, shall we?

The Tories are accussing Labour of running a "class war campaign" after they repeatedly attacked Labour's by-election candidate in Brent for living in "millionaires row". 
Oddly, I don't remember Andrew Rawnsley, John Harris or Quentin Letts frothing with rage and declaring it the lowest point in the history of politics.  Funny that.

Don't believe me? Well, here's a link to the Tories very own "Class war" leaflet, complete with "outrageous" picture  of the Labour candidates mansion on "millionaires row"

And how about immigration? The Tories are apparently disgusted that Labour mentioned ID cards for foriegn nationals, saying that despite it being Tory party policy to oppose them, it was xenophobic of us to even mention it.
Yet this same Tory campaign opened their pitch for votes with a press release about the need to reduce immigration.

Strangely it's now been airbrushed from history, having disappeared from the Tories by-election news archive in an impressively Orwellian piece of doublethink. 

Still, these things are harder to hide than just deleting them from your website, especially when you've got your friend Iain Dale to promote it on his blog...

So here's a quote from the first Tory Press release of the campaign, a personal letter from Tory candidate Edward Timpson.

"Do you believe that the net level of immigration should be reduced?"

I believe that this government has failed to give local public services the support they need to cope with a rising population... so we need to plan properly for increases in population, and reduce the overall level of net immigration"

So who exactly is running the xenophobic campaign?

The Tories have also been flat out lying about Labour. They're Telling journalists we've been calling people at 4am pretending to be Tories.

This is a lie.

It's a lie that has two useful components - It's both re-usable (this briefing has been done before) and undisprovable - how can Labour ever prove that they haven't been phoning people up like this? It's impossible

The fact journalists have swallowed this stuff shows how much they want to believe the Tory campaign machine.
So who else is "running a class war campaign"? Surely not the sainted Lib Dems, whose champions despise that sort of thing.

Strange then that Lib Dem leaflets here in Crewe feature quotes like this one prominently...

"Out of touch Teddy? Conservative millionaire Edward Timpson is looking increasingly out of touch with hard-working families people in Crewe and Nantwich. Edward’s family business has a turnover of £100 million – and his parents bought him a race horse for his 30th birthday”

Nor would the Lib dems dog whistle on immigration, being far to pure for that. So it must have been an evil gremlin who inserted these words into a Lib Dem campaign direct mail...

“Rising immigration is adding pressure to our overstretched schools and local NHS”

So, yes- it's a roughty, toughty campaign. By elections often are.

Except for one thing. No-one, not Tory journalists or leftie ones seems to be interested in asking the tories any hard questions.

After all their candidate stands to benefit from a Tory tax cut worth hundreds of thousands to him and his family, but won't say if he thinks that's a better way of spending money than a tax cut for local families.

Their candidate says he's opposed to Post Office cuts, but won't tell David Cameron he should sack his Post Office spokesman, who said the Tories would shrink the post office network.

Nor would the Tory candidate cut car tax, as his leaflets suggest- because his Leader has said he won't.

Yet all the Tory candidate does in this campaign is nod supportively next to his leader, hardly saying a word while his boss does all the talking.

He knows his place, I guess, and is backing Cameron not Crewe


Display: Sort:

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#1)

The problem is that for a lot of people on the left, when the Tories kick them in the head the first thing they do after getting up is apologise for having scuffed their boots.

 

Tories are liars. Press are liars. Lots of the left prefer to be pure rather than actually have the power needed to change the world. So what else is new?

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#2)

Hopi

I too was in Crewe over the weekend and agree with you entirely. Interestingly enough I wrote a response to John Harris's piece in last week's Guardian, was promised that it would be posted on CiF but it is yet to appear.

To read what I have written click on the link below.

Mike

http://mike-ion.blogspot.com/2008/05/labour-campaign-in-crewe.html

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#3)

The problem is that leaftlet from the Tories looks quite old, infact from the 2005 era under Howard, which was ruddy awful and rightly disasterous for the Tories. There's no mention of Dunwoody's name and from what I have been able to find so far. I think the main problem is that it has been seen largely as the main "line of attack" within the Labour campaign, the Hoodies and the Dressed-up-"Toff"-who-was-privately-educated fellow.

 Fact is the Tories have been trying to run a higher positive campaign under the "New-Tory" era because they were expecting this kind of bizarre shot from Labour, the press and the Tories can smell blood.

For once people seem to want some hope and are being hit hard in the pocket, and instead of the government trying to reign in on public spending they're going off borrowing money, which we're all going to have to pay back eventually.

I seem to notice also a complete lack of literature from Crewe and Nantwich here on this site, and indeed in your article, so it seems a bit of a misnomer to just talk about old Tory leaflets.

I heard Miss Hartman on The Politics Show today talk about the "positive" campaign being run in C&N, she seemed very uncomfortable about actually saying that but aside from a pair of posters of Ms Dunwoody with a couple of famous faces, every last copy of Labour leaflets I have found seem to show very negative campaigning and personal attacks.

Also, I beleive Mr Timpson has said plenty on his website with a couple of podcasts, also, reading through various blogs seems to show Mr Timpson out on the streets most days meeting and greeting people. Dunwoody has done the same, but they now seem to be avoiding the press since the gaff with the questioning about Mr Brown leaked its way onto the internet.

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#4)

Sounds like some very sore Labour heads here. It is awfully hard when even the grauniad gets fed up with you:))

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#5)

Good investigative work hopisen.

Let's not forget Iain Dale's little slip up this morning telling the world how his 'correspondent' in Crewe and Nantwich lied to Tamsin Dunwoody by saying he was a Labour activist (when he is in fact a Conservative activist) in order to get information from her whilst she was having a private meal with her children.

Tories = manipulative liars. Never forget that.

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#6)

Tories = manipulative liars. Never forget that.

NM - could you possibly explain why the actions of one person can then be transposed to be true of a whole party?

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#9)

It's not the actions of one person. It's first the action of one person in allegedly going under cover and finding out next to nothing. And THEN more important it is the action of Iain Dale in celebrating that action, plus retreads elsewhere.

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#7)

Not good enough I'm afraid. We're all as bad as each other seems to be the message. They are not the parties of equality....we are. The Crewe campaign has brought the party into disrepute and if we're serious about decency - the person who authorised those leaflets should be removed. End of story.

Re: Tory and Lib Dem by-election hypocrisy... (#8)

I know from painful experience that voters hate negative campaigning at the best of times.  Considering people are struggling to make a living, concerned about education, the credit crunch  and crime etc,  I think the last thing we need to be doing is employing people dressed as toffs and distributing negative class based leaflets because it insults the intelligence.

I'm lucky to have worked in the real world and not gone straight into politics from University.  Maybe if some of these people had more day to day communication with actual voters and not OHP projectors then Labour would be better placed to win in 2010.