Is this the issue that will cost Labour the next election?

Help the Aged and Friends of the Earth today started legal proceedings against the Government because of alleged inaction over fuel poverty. Will pensioner power force Labour from Government at the next national poll?

Today's news that charities Help the Aged and Friends of the Earth are seeking a judicial review application in order to challenge the Government over its fuel poverty strategy didn't seem to set the media alight, but this is a slow-burning issue (excuse the pun) which could seriously threaten Labour's electoral chances at the next election.

Despite official consumer price inflation figures suggesting increases in the general level of prices remain relatively modest - 2.3% in 2007 - fuel prices have been rising at a much faster rate in recent years. For example, electricity price inflation was 8.0% in 2007, down from 21.7% in 2006, and gas price inflation was 7.6% in 2007, down from 31.3% in 2006. In summary, domestic fuel prices rose at over three times the rate of general prices last year, and almost fifteen times as fast the year before.*

Those who lose out from high price inflation on 'necessary' goods (goods that are demand-inelastic) are predominantly those on fixed incomes, such as pensioners and the unemployed.

Rightly, the Government had previously committed to eradicating fuel poverty by 2010 - this was a legally binding commitment. Yet in their latest annual report on progress towards these targets, the Fuel Poverty Advisory Group (alarmingly) note that:
"The Government appears to have given up on the legally binding 2010 Fuel Poverty Target."

In 2007, 2.9m households and 2.3m vulnerable households remained in fuel poverty.

Help the Aged and Friends of the Earth are right that the Government should not give up on its promise to eradicate fuel poverty merely because energy prices continue to rise (if anything, that should be even more reason to meet its target).

However, the Government can ill-afford the additional expenditure necessary to fulfil its legal obligation on fuel poverty. Finances are already tight, and additional taxation in the current uncertain global economic climate is likely to compound the downside risks to the economy.

That will be scant consolation to the hundreds of thousands of pensioners who cannot afford to heat their homes.

If the 2010 target isn't met, and if the Government do little to alleviate current energy inflation, then pensioners (amongst others) will be rightly aggrieved. And what's more, they are the most likely to vent their anger at the ballot box.

The Government ignores its pledge on fuel poverty at its own peril...

*Source: ONS

alexanderbaker.org.uk

UPDATE: John Hutton has brokered an additional £225m to help eradicate fuel poverty. This will help an estimated 100,000 homes - progress, but more needs to be done...

Display: Sort:

Re: Is this the issue (#1)

Stop profiteering off the needs of working people. Nationalise gas and electric under workers control and keep prices lower.

Simple.

Re: Is this the issue (#3)

workers control and keep prices lower.

Er, what precisely do you mean?  Workers control?  In terms of keeping prices lower, would that mean subsidisation in a time of high oil prices etc?

Re: Is this the issue (#4)

Removing the profit from the distribution of essential public services would keep prices lower.

The perverse and callous 10p Tax Bombshell (#2)

The 'grey' lobby will join the other pressure groups asking for more money and pushing for more support. That's all good and understandable.

However, given the 'hidden' timebomb that has just gone off re. tax increases on some of the lowest paid (including lower-earning singles under 25, women aged 60-64 etc) because of the abolition of the 10p tax rate... This active discrimination that benefits wealthier individuals flies straight in the face of what the Labour Party is in business for.
It couldn't be any more callous or frankly just plain perverse.

It seems the impact of this tax hike on some of the lowest paid wont be examined or even addressed (if it will be) until November at the earliest.

The arrogant disregard over this matter shown by some in the Government is a frightening display of contempt for some of our core supporters and for anyone concerned about injustice and inequality.
What on earth are we playing at ?
You can be sure that some of us will be watching this matter closely and that a rebellion will only grow if it's not dealt with. I say this as a new Labour loyalist.

I'm with Frank Field MP on this one.
This is the kind of issue that could also help to relieve us of high office and repel activists from working for us.
The 10p tax bombshell needs fixing.

Nope. That'll be the house price crash. (#5)

This is completely daft. Either you believe that VAT on domestic fuel is akin to a Poll Tax, and want to scrap it (a perfectly reasonable point of view). Or you believe in this 'man made global warming" nonsense, in which case you want to increase taxes on domestic fuel. Problem being of course, that demand for domestic heat and light is very price inelastic, so the tax would have to be 100% or more before there is any noticeable reduction in quantity used. It's make up your mind time!

Re: Nope. That'll be the house price crash. (#7)

"Either you believe that VAT on domestic fuel is akin to a Poll Tax, and want to scrap it (a perfectly reasonable point of view). Or you believe in this 'man made global warming" nonsense, in which case you want to increase taxes on domestic fuel."

Can I tick the improve energy efficiency on existing housing stock and reduce demand box?

Assistance thru big energy firms? (#6)

I'm uneasy that the £225 million assistance seems all being directed thru the big energy firms, who have a commercial interest not to minimise cost. In part those in fuel poverty should be encouraged to switch suppliers to cheaper ones, but will that happen with suppliers giving the help? eg I wonder if those on prepayment meters will be told about the not-for-profit gas and electricity supplier Ebico who do not charge extra for prepayment meters?