Obama Woo

How things look for Senator Barack Obama from a Labour activist, stateside

One of the Chicago baseball teams has a mascot called Ronnie Roo, who has given his endorsement to Barack Obama. A couple of days ago he arrived at volunteer HQ in the Ogilvie area, being filmed by a local TV company, chanting "Obama Woo". From a British perspective it was an unusual siight.
But Barack Obama does attract a variety of people and one of his strengths is the sheer grassroots support compared to Hillary Clinton's seasoned media attack style.
But that may not be enough in itself to help Obama at the Convention later this year, but it is an advantage. The last primaries gave Hillary Clinton the edge, particually in the crucial primary of Ohio, but she did not get the significant double digit no's needed ahead of Senator Obama in order to make an impression on the delegates. The superdelegates may know their own minds and know how they want to vote, but if there is a significant groundswell of grassroots for Obama in the US at the moment. If he can keep ahead, and/or keep snapping at Hillary Clinton's feet, if he can keep positive and keep focused, whilst pointing out where Hillary Clinton is making sweeping generalisations of her own success, and garner enough support on the caucuses, then we may likely see an Obama/McCain battle this autumn



Display: Sort:

Re: Obama Woo (#1)

Good to know.  Tell us more about Obama's HQ.  What's the lay out?  Number of people working there?  Type of work carried out? etc etc.  Thanks! LW

Re: Obama Woo (#2)

Well we have over a hundred volunteers helping out with varying types of work of the sort you see at any election time. If anything, there is a grassroots enthusiasm in that we have people prepared to muck doing pretty much anything, as opposed to how it is in some campaigns over in the UK

Re: Obama Woo (#3)

Paul, the greatest thing you could probably do for Obama is go on the American version of Newsnight and condemn Hillary Clinton. It worked on Hain, after all.

Re: Obama Woo (#4)

What exactly is the point of the Democrats having proportional representation when the candidate who gets the most votes doesn't get the most delegates?

Twice now this has happened - in Nevada and Texas where Clinton wins the vote and Obama gets the delegate lead.

Not to mention the lack of true democracy in the caucuses where there is no secret ballot.

We could well end up with a situation at the end where Hillary wins the popular vote (providing Florida and Michigan are allowed to vote again) yet Obama has the most pledged delegates. Then how will the superdelegates decide who wins?

Re: Obama Woo (#5)

Well that will have to be an issue for the Democrats to address at a later time. As it is, considering the states Senator Obama has picked up on already with regards to popular support, a reverse argument could well be made, only I suspect/hope the Superdelegates will back Obama with that in mind

Re: Obama Woo (#6)

If Florida and Michigan were to be counted (and Florida is moving toward an all-postal ballot according to Senator Bill Nelson), and that Clinton won both States by a large margin (given the Primary result in Texas, it's not inconceivable that Obama could challenge Clinton in Florida - similar demographics), then it's almost inconceivable that Clinton could lead the popular vote and trail in pledged delegates.  She only trails on both scores when you discount Michigan and Florida.