Labour MP bugged by police

Sadiq Khan, now Assistant Government Whip with responsibility toward Ministry of Justice legislation, has allegedly been deliberately bugged twice when visiting a constituent, Babar Ahmad, in prison during 2005 and 2006.

There is a government edict against the bugging of MPs since the bugging scandal of Harold Wilson’s government - the Wilson Doctrine, reaffirmed in a written answer by Gordon Brown 5 months ago. Apparently "Knowing that Khan was coming, the antiterrorist squad requested the bugging", and it seems it was authorised despite the edict confirmed by Gordon Brown, and the fact Sadiq Khan is also a lawyer who usually have privileged access.

What is going on in the Met? Ahmad has lodged a civil claim against Sir Ian Blair, so the Met has direct self-interest here. [turned out later it was at the request of the Met, but done by Thames Valley police]

The other allegation coming out is that at least six visitor tables are permanently set up for bugging at Woodhill prison in Milton Keynes, operated and maintained by specialist detectives permanently based at the prison. So it would seem bugging prisoners is common-place in the UK now.

Andrew Mackinlay said "It is an affront to democracy and has all the hallmarks of a totalitarian regime. No one is suggesting that MPs should be above the law, but when behaving as MPs and dealing with people’s liberty that must be sacrosanct as it is with lawyers." Absolutely.

It is good that some in the Met/Scotland Yard are so aghast they are willing to leak this.

Update: Jack Straw has already ordered an inquiry, and said it is "completely unacceptable" for an MP to be recorded while talking to a constituent.

BTW Babar Ahmad faces no charges in the UK, the US want to extradite him - he bas been in prison since 2004, and is now awaiting a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights. Ahmad is a childhood friend of Sadiq Khan.

Update 2: Nick Robinson has just said on The World at One that ministers had not authorised this; a Thames Valley detective is being disciplined, but the detective claims he had the approval of his Chief Constable and Khan was not the target.

Update 3: The story is running hot - Nick Robinson said on The World Tonight: Home Office civil servants knew about this December, but ministers only heard last w/e. The police officer who did the bugging says that he came under "significant pressure from the Metropolitan police requesting that we covertly record a social visit between a terrorist detainee and a member of Parliament ... I did record the visit but have never felt it was justified in these circumstances." Khan was of particular interest to some of the Met, and some in the Met regard Sadiq Khan as a subversive. The Daily Mail reports "Scotland Yard's most senior officers first authorised the bugging of the pair as long ago as 2004." Jack Straw said today the Wilson Doctrine does not cover the use of bugs to listen in to conversations. Nick Robinson added on BBC News that he has been told that during the Northern Ireland peace process several MPs had been bugged. Doesn't sound like this will quiet down with an enquiry announced, and there is lots of leaking.

Display: Sort:

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#1)

I am ENRAGED about this.  They damn well know who ordred Sadiq Khan's visit to be bugged.  He would have had to have filled out a visiting order seeking perimission to visit and the little snitches at the prison probably went running to  the "powers that be" to "warn" them about a Muslim MP
visiting a dangerous Muslim "terrorist".  This is a disgrace and would not have happened if Sadiq Khan wasn't Muslim.  People in the Met have some serious questions to answer.

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#2)

An interesting question is what authority exactly is needed to bug a prison. Gordon Brown wrote: "The Wilson Doctrine applies to all forms of interception that are subject to authorisation by Secretary of State warrant." Maybe this didn't need a SoS warrant, so Charles Clarke (and perhaps John Reid) wouldn't need to sign off on this, and indeed the Wilson Doctrine has not been technically breached. Such is the way with finely tuned drafting of words.

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#8)

It seems the Wilson Doctrine, as formulated by Gordon, wasn't broken on two counts. a) it doesn't cover  eavesdropping; b) a Chief Constable can authorise eavesdropping in prison, an SoS warrant isn't needed:

Mr Straw confirmed that a chief officer of police could have authorised the eavesdropping operation under the existing rules. Under the 2000 Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, he said eavesdropping can be authorised by a police chief without the permission of a minister if it takes place inside a prison. However, as he explained to MPs, normally a Secretary of State has to give authorisation for bugging suspects – the Home Secretary for bugging by the police, MI5 and Special Branch or the Foreign Secretary for bugging by MI6 and GCHQ.

Crystal clear? I think not to most, though Tony Benn seems to have appreciated it, but was "wary of making too much of this in the past because he knew he would be accused of being paranoid."

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#10)

Actually Hugh, his first rebellion was with 48 other Labour MP's voting AGAINST 90 days, and supporting the rebel motion for 28 days instead.

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#12)

on that link, you click on Sadiq Khan MP, Tooting, and it tells you that two of his rebellions were on 90 days, and then supporting 28 days.

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#14)

No, I don't think so; he voted no to Division No. 84 to amend to 90 days - check out the parliament.uk link. Looks like publicwhip.org.uk is confusing or wrong on this one. Anyway at a glance this amendment looks mostly technical, only changing the length from 3 months to 90 days, so this particular amendment doesn't look a big deal even if he had voted for it.

Re: Government Whip bugged by the Met (#15)

Duh - used the wrong URL. Try this parliament.uk one.

Re: Labour MP bugged by the Met (#3)

MP's are no different then anyone else, if you bug lawyers or police, then why not MP's, whats good for me should be good enough for them

Re: Labour MP bugged by the Met (#4)

The classic answer is a) lawyers cannot be bugged talking to clients - privileged access that the courts defend. b) to hinder the security services trying to influence/discredit/topple governments, as it was alleged some in MI5 tried during the Wilson govt.

Sadiq Khan is obviously a potential high-flier. Say some in the security-establishment didn't want a Muslim senior Minister in the future, especially one that has been a very successful human rights solicitor. Then bugging him to find something that could be leaked in future to discredit him should not be a possibility open to them.

Re: Labour MP bugged by the Met (#9)

So what might he say that might "discredit" him? What's he want to hide?

 Whenever anybody complains about this govt's cavalier attitude to civil liberties, we're always told "ah, but it'll save lives", even when it's demonstrably untrue. And he's supported this. Too late to whine about principle now.

 

Re: Labour MP bugged by police (#6)

A jack boot.

Re: Labour MP bugged by police (#16)

Telegraph has more on how this story came out, not a Met/Home Office leak this time:

Ironically, it seems that it was Mr Kearney's ex-wife Linda who brought the bugging of Mr Khan to his fellow MPs.

Last autumn she went to see her local MP, the Conservative Andrew Selous, to complain about the fact that her house had also been raided by the police even though she and Mr Kearney no longer lived together.

She detailed Mr Kearney's reservations over the bugging of Mr Khan, and The Daily Telegraph understands that Mr Selous alerted the Home Office and David Davis, the shadow home secretary, who in turn wrote to the Prime Minister.