The new General Secretary of the Labour Party is...

...comrades here on Labourhome will no doubt be surprised and saddened to learn...

...NOT ME!

I've received a very polite letter from "Rockpools" explaining that they 'will not be taking [my] application any further'.  Apparently, after meeting with NEC officers, a 'long-list of candidates to be interviewed' has been agreed.  (I do think it might have been nice to describe it as a short-list - however long it actually is - for my self esteem!)

However, they do go on to say 'it is no great pleasure to have to write this type of letter' (I do wonder whether this is why the party has paid a private executive recruiting firm to appoint the post, so that such things can be typed with a straight face!) - apparently the General Secretary role 'generated much interest and captured the attention of some very talented professionals from a variety of sectors'.  I'm now on tenterhooks to find out which of these dynamic, talented individuals will be selected for the post!

Anyway, they thanked me for my time and effort (bless) and also invited me to 'a series of Senior Executive Development Workshops'!!

On a slightly more serious note, it is of concern that we appear to be seeking a private-sector-style business executive to take this role now rather than a party figure.  Because of past incumbants I thought 'York Labour Club - tick; Ph.D - tick; reputation for slavish loyalty - tick' - the job was mine!  Clearly we are approaching a different era: when it asked for current salary on the application form it gave an example (I can't remember what it was but it was many times higher than my own) and the list of possible 'current jobs' before it got to 'other' was all very much on the senior executive/manager level.  Is this what we want from our next General Secretary?  Great if it is!  I'm not 100% sure.  Party figures haven't always been fantastic; but it helps to understand the party and the movement, I should have thought.

Anyway - thanks for all your thousands of best wishes messages for my application (!) and the many members of the 'Doctordunc for General Secretary' Facebook group, but the dream is over!

(PS: Just in case the proximity of my tongue to my cheek isn't entirely obvious on the screen I should mention that that Facebook group never really existed!!)

Display: Sort:

General Secretary of the Labour Party is... (#1)

(PS: Just in case the proximity of my tongue to my cheek isn't entirely obvious on the screen I should mention that that Facebook group never really existed!!)

That's a pity - I would happily have joined.

Re: General Secretary of the Labour Party is... (#2)

Dunc, your application was like casting pearls before swine!

Re: General Secretary of the Labour Party is... (#4)

Well this is true...

It was interesting and worthwhile putting in an application as I think it does give an insight that I might not otherwise have had into the process.

Re: General Secretary of the Labour Party is... (#5)

A few points - don't forget that some of the best candidates for the job might be in politically restricted posts, so are unable to be Party members at the present time.
Isnt it the job of our elected politicians (Leader, Deputy Leader, Party Chair or whoever) to lead and inspire the Party membership - and for our appointed officials to make sure the Party administration and finances are run efficiently, legally and effectively in terms of campaigning support? Yes they have to be fully supportive of Labour's aims and values, but not necessarily able to pass a quiz on the Tolpuddle Martyrs or Tony Benn's Diaries.

Re: General Secretary of the Labour Party is... (#6)


That might have been where I went wrong...

No, I agree that the General Secretary should not be too political a role.  (Indeed at certain times in the past it may have been too political: some of Blair's early General Secretaries seemed to do rather more to exert the will of the leadership onto the party than they did to serve the party). 

General Secretary (#3)

I am hoping for Mike Griffiths

Wiseman

Re: General Secretary (#7)

Mike Griffiths would be an absolutely excellent choice.  As NEC Chair he actually brought some 'human' skills to the job.  Watt was a just jumped up arrogant heavie who was totally biased against ordinary members.  Having seen and spoken to Griffiths at conference many a time, I think he's approachable and competent.  I hope members - if we have any say these dayds -  will choose him.