It's Not Squandered Money

The Tories keep talking about Northern Rock and the latest cash injection as if it were money spent and gone. It is borrowing, but it's borrowing to invest.



According to Ashley Seager in the Guardian, Darling announced last week that half the £26bn loaned to Northern Rock has been repaid. The ONS added the loan figure to the National Debt, and they might do the same with banks benefiting from the £50bn cash injection. I've asked them for clarification.

The Swedish example shows that with a similar program and in a similar situation, the goverment could break even or even slightly benefit the tax payer overall. This will only work if the Chancellor sets out tough terms for the banks accepting public money, and makes sure that the taxpayer benefits.

Display: Sort:

Re: It's Not Squandered Money (#1)

Was Northern Rock only(!) £26bn? I have the figure in my head of £40bn, why's that?

Re: It's Not Squandered Money (#2)

Seems so - and remember it is a loan that will mostly be paid back. Northern Rock loan book currently is about £84 billion, most funded from savers. Guardian says "about half of the £26bn government loan to Northern Rock in the wake of its collapse had already been paid back".

Losses depends on how much mortgage default there will be. I did some back-of-envelope estimates a month ago, for what I then thought was worst case, and thought the loan write-offs worst case was about £3 billion:

Looking at the 2008H1 accounts the loans split is:

7% Buy to let
26% Together
67% Standard

If we assume 25% of the non-standard loans and 10% of the Standard loans go wrong, and in each case 25% of the loan cannot be recovered, I make the write-off £3.1 billion:

(((0.33 * 0.25 * .25) + (0.67 * 0.1 * .25)) * 84.4 = 3.148

Arrears are currently less than the Council of Mortgage Lenders average.

But it does seem to have £3.5 billion of "Treasury investments" graded lower than AA, which is probably a worry, though impairment charges have been made against this risk.

Re: It's Not Squandered Money (#3)

Looking at the current and projected resposession figures, this does look like the worst case. I'll be very interested to see how much the government gets back when it sells off its stake. I wonder if the management of NR are taking a less heavy-handed approach to mortgage arrears than they would do otherwise?

Re: It's Not Squandered Money (#4)

I forgot to mention operating losses as well. CEO says "We do not expect the bank will be returned to break-even point before 2010 to 2011. It will be loss-making this year and, ultimately, next year." It lost £585 million in 2008H1, so it might lose about £2 billion in operations before break-even - though at that point the business might have a considerable sale value to offset the losses.