Return of the workhouse?

I listened and read with interest David Cameron’s plans for the long-term unemployed. I was intrigued and concerned.

Many years ago, people who could not afford to continue living, ended up in the workhouse and working for a pittance for unscrupulous, exploitative bosses.


Being poor is not something to be ashamed of, a crime or a debt to society. Poor people need help, encouragement, even coercion, not punishment.


Under Cameron’s plans the long term unemployed would be required to carry out 12 months community service. This is more than criminals get (I agree they should get more). I would like to know how many Tories have been long term unemployed? I have previously been unemployed and on the dole for 3 months. It is depressing, demoralising and I was given no help or encouragement to find a job. I had just left University and many students have difficulty finding their first job.

Under Cameron’s proposals, the two-year limit on job seekers’ allowance would apply to “continuous and cumulative periods of unemployment”. Therefore if I am on the dole for 1 year and 9 months, demoralised, depressed, rejected and I do not have enough to pay my rent or find a job, I would have to mop up after people committing criminal damage. All of this due to intermittent short periods of unemployment in my life.


I am an educated, hard working, tax-paying individual, with much to contribute to the world of work. Having people like me doing this is a waste.


I want the unemployed to have jobs, to have dignity and be something they, their family and society can be proud of. I do not want to return to a society where everyone is supposed to “know their place” and aspiration is rare. We are talking about not the breaking of an underclass, but visually galvanising it. It sounds to me like David Cameron is just planning for the day when under the Tories unemployment reaches 3 million again.


David Cameron, Mr nice guy? Sounds more like a return of the workhouse.

Councillor James Alexander
Prospective Labour MP for York Outer

www.time-4-change.org.uk



Display: Sort:

Re: Return of the workhouse? (#1)

You have to admit though we do have  hard core of people who see work as being to much for them, last night on TV a bloke stated why should I work for the government to tax me, I do not believe in paying tax, but he did believe in getting benefits.


Yes I've seen men with six kids with different mothers refuse to work, why should I pay for that's Bitches kids, forgetting he had the child as well.


We do need to help real unemployed, but this hard core of people who refuse should be sorted out.

Re: Return of the workhouse? (#2)

You're absolutely right treboc; we have to crack down on anyone who abuses the system or takes advantage of it. If you decide to adopt an unconventional lifestyle then 'you damn well pay for it yourself'. Thats the message that should be going out.

Re: Return of the workhouse? (#3)

I'm afraid I see your entire argument as plain daft.

Are you genuinely suggesting (as your article reads to me) that anyone who wants to should be able to claim unemployment benefit?

By doing so you would simply be encouraging people not to work and spending a ludicrous amount of taxpayers' money.

People do not pay tax to pay other people not to work. 

Re: Return of the workhouse? (#4)

I am saying that the unemployed need jobs, not punishment.

James 

Re: Return of the workhouse? (#5)

Visiting Tory - what on earth makes you think people want to spend their taxes on companies that make a profit out of not getting people into work (and putting them on community service instead).  The proposal is degrading and unpleasant as well as being completely useless (insofar as it won't get a single person into work and won't save the tax payer a penny).