tygerland is back in the fold

I have rejoined the Labour Party.

I may have made a mistake.

I think I have jumped the gun.

Today I rejoined the Labour Party.

As you may or may not know, I left the Labour Party over Iraq.  I believe the parliament was deliberately misled, and that the Labour Party made a fundamental error in following a rightwing cabal into a war of choice.  I had promised myself that I would never rejoin until Blair was gone.

In the end I decided that if I wanted to debate and wax lyrical about the future post-Blair direction of the party, then I must be a member now.

However my membership is dependent on several things: -

  • We follow the recommendations of Peter Hain, and reassert Robin Cook's idea of an ethical foreign policy.  We sever our close links with the Bush administration and support a Democrat victory in '08 (this does not mean we cannot have fruitful relations with any future Giuliani or McCain White House)


  • A Brown government scraps the proposed ID. Cards


  • We work towards further reform of the NHS, Home Office, and prison service - we demand returns on investment and force through necessary changes


  • We stop pandering to a rightwing press on criminal justice and look to European - mainly Scandinavian - successes in dealing with re-offending and drugs


  • We reduce our reliance on foreign-sourced energy, even if this means more nuclear power stations (yes, yes, I know we do not get Uranium from Kent, but I refer to our reliance on Russian gas, and Middle Eastern oil)


  • We offset a decision on replacing Trident (by refurbishing the current arsenal) for 10-years.  I believe that the geopolitical tectonic plates are in a flux, and that in a decade, we'll better know who our allies are, and where our priorities lie (although, ultimately, this blog would welcome Britain relinquishing its nuclear `deterrent')


  • We have a consistent and critical approach to authoritarian regimes


  • We reform the House of Lords (although this now appears to be a given)


  • We have a full review of the tax system and look to simplify.  I would like to see a greater use of incentives to shape behaviour and a simplification of the underlying tax code


  • The draconian, anti-democratic limits on legitimate protest are scrapped


  • I would like to see the proclivity of this government to control and monitor law-abiding people diminish.  I accept this is a small country, and not the American Mid-West, but the current trend of authoritarianism is dangerous, illiberal, and contrary to liberty and democracy

    I know I'm not in a position to demand anything.  I'm just a blogger, shouting in the hope that someone is listening.  Our leaders have a habit of not listening to us, and I doubt running a blog gives me any more clout that the average Joe, but these are my terms.  

    And if, a year into the next Labour administration, steps are not taken in a more liberal and progressive direction, and at least some progress is made towards the above demands, then I will indeed take my membership elsewhere.

    I am very impressed with this interview by Peter Hain (who I support for the Deputy Leadership) in The New Statesman.  Hain shares my belief that we need to be bold on the international stage, and be critical of both dictatorships and Neoconservatism alike.  

    As you know, this is a very internationalist blog, much more distracted with international affairs than it is with domestic policy, and this blog sees Peter Hain as an internationalist politician with genuine progressive credentials.  We live in a globalised world, with porous borders, where no country can be insular - we must look forward and engage with the international community.  This is why I believe that Hain would be an incomparable foil for a Brown government.

    Hain is a team player who is prepared to be radical when contributing to policy debates, yet accepts the reality of collective cabinet decision-making.  Any Deputy PM/Leader would need these complex skills, and simply being an old Labour stalwart, hankering for a more socialist direction, is not enough.

    The reality of politics is that you are ultimately let down.  I understand this.  I am ready for this.

    I also promise that the instinctive independence of my blog is maintained.  During my hiatus from the Labour Party my writing has been very critical of the government and its tribulations - I see no reason for this to change.  

    I'll defend the Labour Party when - and if - it engages in rational progressive politics.  I will not defend the authoritarian and reactionary politics of fear.  And I will not defend legislation or taxation that hinders the advancement of the knowledge economy.  Education is, and always will be, king.

    This is not an endorsement of any aspect of Labour's third term or the pending Brown government.  Labour will be judged by its actions, but I hope, by being on the inside, I can do my little bit to shape the direction of this once venerable political party.

    This originally appeared on tygerland.net


  • Display: Sort:

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#1)

    You've left out the important question!

    Is it Eastenders or Coronation Street?

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#6)

    South Park.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#12)

    The Simpsons, you can't get a better example of a dysfunctional family, under pressure, torn between consumerism and altruism. The dilemma of modern day Britain.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#2)

    What's  your view on Hain and Trident? Could he  not have helped shape the "progressive" agenda  by resigning. I cannot imagine he privately  follows the Govt line.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#4)

    Resignations are tricky.  Everyone has their resignation threshold.  I cancelled my membership over Iraq, yet I don't feel as strongly over Trident.

    I don't think Hain should have resigned over Trident unless that was his buzz-issue.  

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#3)

    It's always good to have an old comrade back - but are all those conditions dealbreakers or are some negotiable?

    Have you approached peter to get his take on them?

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#5)

    No I haven't spoken to Peter Hain.  Although I do monitor his position via the prism of the media - although you're right, it would be better to discuss these issues.  Nobody is the perfect candidate, but Hain's international pedigree and personal history appeal the most.

    I know the limits of government.  But a change of direction would be necessary.  I think Blair's politics have become increasingly rightwing - I don't vote Labour to suffer rightwing politics.  I would rather Blair worried less about Murdoch and Dacre, and more about his own members.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#7)

    It's good that you've rejoined the party, but I doubt you will get some of your demands.

    ID cards will go ahead and Trident will definately be replaced with legislation passing through this year (both rightly so in my view).

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#8)

    I have not yet heard a single argument for Trident that can't be thoroughly demolished with just a modicum scrutiny.

    But I invite you to have a go.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#16)

    What about...

    "If we dont have them, what's to stop any tinpot dictator who gets nukes over the next 50 years from blackmailing us without consequences?"

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#17)

    Tell me, why would a tin-pot dictator want to blackmail a small country stuck between France and Norway?

    Are the Danes attacking again?

    I wonder, how do the Germans and the Swedes sleep at night?

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#18)

    The Danes and Swedes don't need them because WE'VE got them.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#13)

    In a way you can't impose conditions on membership; you either accept the whole package or not at all. Loyal members stay in the Party and attempt to change policy from within. Fellow Travellers and 'Fair Weather Friends' are only in it for the ride.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#14)

    Since when  did  everyone in the Party "accept the whole package" Keep Left,Tribune group, Bevanites,Independent Labour Party.All these splits  and different factions   long pre-date the Blair and even Wilson eras. Agree to disagree used to be  the broad church Labour Party's mantra.
    Now if you'reanodinary member  it's put up or shut up and if you won't shut up we won't let you vote on anything at Conference or anywhere else. If you're  an MP and we can't rely  on your vote, then the Tories are always there to help  because our policies are the same.
    We need more dissent ,not less.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#9)

    I went to my LP branch last night. To my supprise I  was the only one in-favor of scraping Trident. It was "Scrap it and we'r unelectable."  Unfortunely thay may be right.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#11)

    Unilateral nuclear disarmament = 18 years of opposition.
    Simple as that.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#15)

    No they are not right necessarily. Quite the opposite. There were street protests where I live. The vote on Trident will probably hand my constituency back to the Tories  on the basis that it'shighly marginal and any lingering loyalty  left people had to  Labour is gone, espesh asourMPis standing down. New Labour is making itself more unelectable by the day.The only thing which can save this Party  from wipe-out at next election is a fundamental change of direction towards socialist values.And a new leader who isn't Blair 2 without the laughs.

    Re: tygerland is back in the fold (#10)

    Welcome back Tygerland - I enjoy your blog