Has Labour failed when it comes to immigration?

I certainly can't see that being the case.

Applications down 9%

Removals UP 16%

Since 1997 removals have risen 127%

So somebody please tell me why it has been open season when it comes to the governments immigration policy?

The last time the figures were this low was during the Major economic disaster, whereas we have achieved the same progress with a completely healthy economy.


From the home office:

http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/about-us/news/asylum-quarter-report

Asylum figures lowest since 1993
27 February 2007

The government's 'tipping the balance' target was met in 2006, according to figures released by the Home Office today. Throughout all of last year, the number of failed asylum seekers who were deported exceeded the number of new arrivals making unfounded asylum claims.

At the same time, asylum applications continued their recent downward trend, hitting the lowest level since 1993, while the number of deportations hit an all-time high.

Last year, 18,235 failed asylum seekers were removed from the UK - a 16% increase on 2005. Since 1997 removals have risen 127%.

The asylum figures for the final quarter of 2006 (new window) showed that during that time asylum applications were down 4% to 6,835 compared to the previous quarter, and removals were up 7% to 4,085.

Outperforming other European nations

The UK is outperforming other European nations, which collectively saw their own asylum applications rise by 14% in the same time period.

Immigration Minister Liam Byrne called the figures 'impressive', and said they showed that the reform programmes at the Home Office and the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) were making a real difference.

'This is an important step on the road to Home Office Reform,' Mr Byrne said. 'This is a substantial achievement and shows how far we have come since asylum applications were at their peak in 2002.'

New measures speed the process

The record-breaking rate of removals was the result of a package of measures brought in by the IND recently to speed up the process. These include:

- ending the right of failed asylum seekers from 'safe' countries to continue to live in the UK while appealing the decision

-strengthening visa handling rules and protections

- improving the technology used by immigration agents on the frontlines

EU accession figures

Other figures released today were the numbers of workers from EU accession states registering to work in the UK. Between October and December 2006, 62,945 applied to work here, compared to 51,160 in the same quarter of 2005.

Mr Byrne said the Worker Registration Scheme figures 'show that migrant workers from the accession states are benefiting the UK by filling skills and labour gaps that cannot be met from the UK-born population.'


Display: Sort:

Re: Has Labour failed when it (#1)

It's the classic pincer. The left got angry at the government because they felt we were being too harsh on Asylum seekers, then the right attacked on Immigration generally.

There's no one left to defend the government.

Re: Has Labour failed when it (#3)

Somebody needs to defend the government.

You can bet the average citizen/express/mail reader would be incredulous at these statistics.

Re: Has Labour failed when it (#5)

Hey, I agree.

How do you mean "failed"? (#2)

You can much about with numbers as much as you like.

To the extent that Labour's policies have allowed the BNP to be come the fourth largest party, yes, their policies (let alone their abject failure to implement any) have been an abject failure.

Re: How do you mean "failed"? (#4)

Fourth largest party? Are you having a laugh mate?

They got less than a % at the last election/

I believe they were about 8th in 05.

You have read the statistics that show success and yet you are still in denial?

Why is that?

Re: How do you mean "failed"? (#6)

Wasn't there a triumphant post on this very website about a local council by-election where Labour got 1,100 and the BNP got 1,040 or something? LibDems and Tories were miles behind.

Whether they'd score half a percent or five percent in a General Election is a different topic.

In denial about what? That the BNP are on the rise? Or that Labour immigration policies are a resounding success and that we all live in peaceful racial harmony?

Re: Has Labour failed (#7)

Being tough of illegal immigration is important for keeping Labour successful. People don't like the idea of illegal immigrants coming into the UK and working in the 'black economy' and I certainly sympathise with that view.

It's important to realise that the Labour government aren't just here to please Labour supporters, they have to serve the British people as a whole.

New Labour failed genuine asylum seekers (#8)

to produce stupid staistics to keep Rupert Murdoch happy.

The fact that asylum applications are down shows that asylum seekers are being detered by the pathetic racist little ministers pandering to the tabloids.

The idea that cutting asylum applications & increasing enforced repatriations is serving british people is stupid. Its created a huge amount of tension & hostility in our inner cities. I know many people who are so appauled at the racism of Straw, Reid & Blair that they will not vote Labour.

Why the hell coulnt we tackle the biggoted press instead of pandering to them? It seems that the interns & political wantabes have ripped the conscience out of our party in their grubby little pursuit of political careers.