Maggie, we love you!

Is it meant to be ironic? Have cyber hackers altered the text? Surely, to paraphrase the great John McEnroe, she cannot be serious?
 

To what and whom am I referring? Why the column on the ConservativeHome website from Tory parliamentary hopeful and sometime novelist, Louise Bagshawe, referring to her “hero-worship” (her phrase) of Margaret Thatcher.

Read this (and no laughing at the back if you please)

“She was the first major politician seriously to warn of global warming. Despite the ludicrous caricature of her public image, she was a champion of social justice, the grocer’s daughter who swept away the barriers to home ownership for many of Britain’s poorest people. Elected on a popular mandate again and again, the voters never threw her out, much to the dismay of the liberal commentariat. She was the ultimate people’s politician.”

More guff of a similarly simpering nature can be found here.

“I have several acquaintances who know Lady Thatcher socially. I can not, and likely will never, make that boast. I do not know Lady Thatcher. But politically, I worship her.

“Posters on this site should not worry when the media spins to them that Cameroon, modern compassionate Conservative MPs and candidates, want to distance themselves from Lady Thatcher. This is nonsense; I do not wish to distance myself. I wish instead merely to touch the hem of her garment.”


Funnily enough, WCH dreams of touching the hem of St. Margaret’s garment too. Usually as I launch the evil old bat off a very high cliff.

WCH

Display: Sort:

Re: Maggie, we love you! (#1)

Its obviously a schoolgirl crush Bagshawe has still not grown out of. Or, she's writing another Mills and Boon novel. Pass the bucket.

Re: Maggie, we love you! (#2)

Louise Bagshawe represents the new wave of Tories to a tee. Pathetic, grovelling, devoid of any backbone and sycophantic.

Tories seem to enjoy re-writing history lately, what with their attempts to portray Major's government as generally decent and competent but with a few bad eggs, and now this purge of Thatcherism to portray it as the bastion of social justice.

Quite difficult to believe in social justice, when you don't even believe in society eh Louise?

I hope Phil Hope MP distributes this drivel to all Corby constituents so they know what they'd be letting themselves in for if they elect Bagshawe.


It's also worth noting that Bagshawe herself was a member of the Labour party before the 1997 general election.

Can't have been too much of a fan of Maggie if you felt it necessary to join her rival party just a few short years after her resignation, eh Louise?

As I said - this is the modern Conservative party. Full of sycophants, cronies and liars - without principle, just riding on the backs of other people's success.

Feel free to reply to these comments Louise (she will read this) but I doubt she will. I think she's more at home with all the other deluded gushy Maggie fan club members at ConHome.

Re: Maggie, we love you! (#3)

No laughing at the back? I fear you ask a little too much of me sir.

Thatcher is by far Britains most overrated prime minister. When she was bad she was very very bad, and when she was good it was nothing to write home about.

Re: Maggie, we love you! (#4)

if opening home ownership barriers meant tackling social justice, surely the profits of the council houses being sold, could have been used to fund more council houses for our most needed workers (i.e. young teachers, nurses, policemen etc.)

Re: Maggie, we love you! (#5)

You've hit on the basic flaw in right to buy; the receipts of sales were not allowed to go back into the Council Housing coffers. But the main objection still is that the Council stock should not have been allowed to be sold off in right to buy at bargain prices. If tenants wanted to buy, then they should have looked to the private sector. It was a Thatcher Tory bribe to win elections, just like the IHT wheeze.