Nottingham South Selection News

With the starting pistol having been fired in the race to become Alan Simpson's successor, I offer a few observations on the process and the early candidates.

Lilian Greenwood, Christine Shawcroft and Katrina Bull have so far shown their hand by sending members material in the post. Katrina may have only sent stuff to members in the Radford and the Park ward that she represents on the council.

Lilian and Katrina's submissions are very New Labour in tone. Christine is the only one to use the 'S' word. Older readers may remember when Labour people used the word 'socialist' to describe themselves. Christine sets out clear positions that she supports, the other two are more cautious in their wording. There's nothing much to disagree with in Lilian and Katrina's work, but then there's nothing that could inspire either. Christine's will inspire the left but her clear policy positions may put off other wings of the party. Doubtless there will be many more candidates in due course, but for now they are choosing to keep their powder dry.

The process is a bit awry in my opinion and I would be interested to learn if other regions or other seats in the East Midlands have had the same process.

The day on which members finally select the candidate is 13 March 2008. Shortlisting by the GC will be on 21 February. My problem is with the Freeze Date. This has been decided by RO as being 28 February 2007, the date of Alan's letter announcing that he did not intend to seek reselection. To participate in the process one has to have been a member six months prior to the Freeze date, i.e. 28 August 2006. So to vote at the final selection meeting requires 18 months membership of the party. When we're trying to get members engaged and participating in the party this strikes me as plain daft. You only needed six months membership to vote in the Deputy Leadership election, but 18 months to vote for selection of a PPC. I know of at least one GC delegate who will not be able to participate in the process as a consequence of this timetable. The reason why this has taken so long is that RO were so appallingly slow in taking action to start the process once Alan had made his intentions clear. Have other CLPs had a similarly long qualifying period? 



Display: Sort:

Re: Nottingham South Selection News (#1)

Actually there was no limit on membership length for the deputy leadership election.

I'm irritated that anyone could join the party and take part in the deputy leadership election days after joining, yet I was barred from being involved in my own CLP selection because i moved CLPs in the last year - despite having been a member since i joined as a 16 year old in 1992

grrr

Re: Nottingham South Selection News (#2)

Yes, if you remember there was the "Join us to join in: elect the next Prime Minister" (sic) campaign. 


That is an absurd freeze date.  I can't see any reason why they don't just use the date of Alan's declaration?  I suppose it's reasonable to freeze it from then because theoretically people may have joined just to vote (although we didn't seem to mind that proposition for leadership/deputy votes) but 6 months before that makes no sense at all.  All the literature persuading people to join is that they can join in with these sorts of decisions and then they find themselves frozen out! 

Re: Nottingham South Selection News (#3)

Good post, I remember joining at the start of my CLPs selection process and thus not being able to vote for a candidate.  I felt hard done by but it was an rather rational rule in my view.  18 months does seem barmy, especially when we lose so many new members who don't renew membership after a year.

Re: Nottingham South Selection News (#4)

quite right, it devalues the membership if we allow just anyone to join and take part in elections; there should be at least 6 months before they are allowed to vote. but i'm more interested in northampton south, where i understand there has been quite a bit of mud-slinging going on between candidates.