Cameron's speech debunked
Some people tell me that it's a waste of time reading the letters section on the newspapers but I often find that the gems of good argument can be found in the rough.
Read David Blunkett's letter in today's Guardian.
Read David Blunkett's letter in today's Guardian.
It is interesting to reflect on how conference speeches can now make such a difference to the general perception - including in the media - of the fitness of anyone to lead this country. Take David Cameron's speech in Blackpool (An election? Bring it on now, October 4). Well put together, cleverly delivered, in what I call the "old style", when no one had autocues.
But as you look at the speech itself, it is clear that style over substance is now the order of the day. Take one or two of the "facts" in his speech. His statistics on the number of children aged 11 who do not come up to scratch in terms of reading and writing were in fact the 1996, not the 2007, statistics. His reference to the powers of magistrates were presumably drawn from a chat with his mum, when she was a magistrate - the powers have changed considerably since then.
Third, he drew on his experience in chatting to a police constable in mid-Wales. Unfortunately, neither the constable or David Cameron appeared to be aware that the changes to the recording system for low-level crimes were introduced by the police service and not by government.
We could, of course, go on. The fact that he had lauded Pauline Neville-Jones, former chair of the joint intelligence committee, would have been flattering to her if, a few sentences later, he had not condemned the very ID cards that Pauline Neville-Jones espouses.
But in the world we live in, who will have noticed?
David Blunkett MP
Lab, Sheffield Brightside
I think I'll email him my congratulations on a brilliantly put letter.
Cameron's speech debunked | 2 comments (2 topical)
Cameron's speech debunked | 2 comments (2 topical)


