The fat of the land.

De minimis non curat lex...Or ...Give me a pasty or give me death!

I am not much of a libertarian, but I do occasionally find myself at odds with the prevailing consensus. The more I think about it, the more I find contradictions with proposed government policy and thinking. I am able to split civil freedoms which I support from the economic freedoms will which I tend to have little enthusiasm. But on the subject of social freedoms. I remain basically a lefty. But as I have said there are occasionally exceptions.

One of the exceptions are the consumption of so-called "unhealthy" food. Let me be honest here, I am a fat git and proud of it. I enjoy tucking into burgers chips and of course my national delicacy a good Cornish pasty. That’s a proper one not one of those horrible things are you get out of county. My family and friends marvel at the excellent quantity of wine and cheese I can knock off. Also sausages, pies, and other wonderful foodstuffs that have now become deemed to be persona non-Greta. Is it only me that looks at the ads on the TV such as the Marks and Spencers ad, then immediately rush out into an empty M&S store and grab all the fillo pastries for myself??....Err..No. The shop seems quite full. Nor do I, having seen an advert with a yellow unfunny clown, rush into a deserted McDonald’s.... No... There is other people in their as well. They may well be people with horrible screaming children, but thear, there.


Let’s take a look at the most famous fat person I can think of. Homer Simpson. Homer may well be an extremely bad parent. He lets Bart use his power tools for his nefarious purposes. Regularly he arrives home drunk, and is highly incompetent at work, amongst other things. Yet Homer is loved by the viewing public. Do adults who watch the Simsons need to rush off and emulate him. Will children watching decide to live their life following the Homer ideal. Of course they won’t The assumption is that you see an advert or role model on the TV, and it becomes your personal goal to obtain the advertised product or you wish to be like the role model whoever they maybe. To think so is intellectually lazy, and since when has it been assumed that anyone other than the employee of an advertising agency thinks that this is the case. (Or maybe I should go out and acquire an AK- 47 assault rifle, because recently I saw Arnie in "The terminator" again.)

There is also a case here for personal choice. Remember the kids in Rotherham who had fish and chips and other real foods sent in through the railings of the school after Jamie Oliver’s attempt to serve them "healthy food". They were simply being denied the right to eat what they wanted, and I will say that I wholeheartedly support the parents sending in the "emergency food parcels". It is wrong to force a particular diet or eating habits on someone else. Also I note the failure of the Oliver project

As to myself. It’s my life and my diet. I have agency, and free will, and therefore will eat whenever I like so long as it can afford it. If you wish to eat health food that your business. Not mine.

There are certain areas of life which should not be legislated on. I think we can all agree on the varying levels that would be applicable to this because the resulting in legislation would by its very nature of its subject be completely at odds with the reality of the situation. Indeed some things are not the business of government... De minimis non curat Lex.. There is an argument about the effects of this generation’s dietary habits on provision of service when they become older, reasonably it may deserve some consideration. So what, if as projected 52 per cent of the population are classed as clinically obese. Or more accurately referred to as fat gits. It’s their business. That’s what people decide for themselves within their lifestyle. There is plenty of nutritional information in the public domain if they wish to avail themselves of it. But other than that, lets all choose our meals without further hindrance.

Because, if not, us fat gits will be around to your place tonight to smash up your car and throw bricks through your windows. Because we also love our ASBO’s as much as we love our burgers.......... So if you want me to eat muesli....Sod off!..and don’t bother me again!
Do I hell...



Display: Sort:

Re: The fat of the land. (#1)

I have this vision in my mind of you having to stand outside by the back door of your work place in the rain with the smokers to eat your pastie because it will have been banned from indoor premises in case someone inhales it's aroma.

First they came for the smokers, then the fatties......

Re: The fat of the land. (#2)

Of course you are correct, you should have the right to eat whatever and as much as you want.

However, in the UK with the NHS, we will likely pay for the gluttony that you practice and espouse. The question is, why should we? If you can't be bothered to look after yourself, why should society?

Re: The fat of the land. (#4)

True. But I’ve paid my N.I. Stamp. Also I do other life threatening things, sometimes I travel in cars, and cross busy roads. Maybe I need to stop doing this sort of thing too. This cheeky posting is really about risk.

Re: The fat of the land. (#7)

Now we know who ate all the pies. Sorry mate you're at the back of the queue when it comes to any kind of medical care. Anyone who abuses their own body by excess of alcohol, tobacco or pasties deserves their predicted end. 

Re: The fat of the land. (#5)

I see no drinkers, no drug addicts, no fatties, no cancer no illness no NHS, boy what  plan.

Re: The fat of the land. (#8)

As you see the my Local NHS Hospital has you "healthy lot" sorted too. If you go in to Trelisk You’ll never come out... See below

The Royal Cornwall Hospital at Treliske failed to meet 31 out of 44 government set standards, giving it the poorest record in the country. It was rated as weak in all areas. The Commission said its main area of concern is the trust's failure to meet standards relating to the safety of patients. The Healthcare Commission is now sending in a team to recommend and oversee improvements. From the BBC

Re: The fat of the land. (#3)

Good article, but you have to remember that fatty foods haven't been banned completely. You can still go to McDonald's and drink coca-cola and eat as many sweets as you like.


But junk food has been banned in most schools (or at least limited) and I think this is right as at least it gives children a chance to have one healthy meal each day which they may not get at home. And naturally, it's right that junk food isn't advertised on TV at times when children will be watching, as with alcohol.

Re: The fat of the land. (#6)

Every school in my area has banned fatty food, yet every school has allowed a sweet van to come into the school to sell crisps and chocolate, because the vans pays a Fee. Money makes the world go around

Re: The fat of the land. (#9)

Just so you know the risks.....


HartDisease 1-5

Cancer 1-7

Stroke 1-24

Moter vehicle (in) 1-84

Suicide 1-119

Falling 1-218

Fire arms assault 1-314 (USA)

Pedestrain accident 1-1,020

Fire/smoke 1-1,113

Bicyling 1-4,919

Aircraft 1-5,051

Gun accident 1-5,134

Electrocution 1-9,968

Alcohol 1-10,084

Hot weather 1-13 7,729

Wasp/incect 1-56,789

Legal execution (USA) 1-162,468

Lightning 1-79746

Earthquake 1-117,127

Flood1-144156

Fireworks 1-340,733

Re: The fat of the land. (#10)

Cornish pasties from Plymouth onwars are rubbish. I sometimes but that West Cornwall pasty co. crap, and always end up disapointed. And also, couldn't agree more about that 'people who watch TV violence, will be violent' crap. I watched 'Spooks' last night, and I don't want to infect people with the bubonic plague. I watch 24 , as does Harriet Harman, do you think either of us are in favour of torture? 

Re: The fat of the land. (#11)

But you have to admit that some people are influenced by the violence on TV, on computer games and on the football field. That is why I am calling for more regulation and censorship of that kind of activity.

Re: The fat of the land. (#12)

I'm not sure I can admit that. There are a number of factors contributing to violence, family breakdown, socio-economic factors often being named. But I don't think any of these factors can explain some crimes like the murder of Jamie Buldger.