Standard of Reporting Goes South

It's a badly kept secret that most of the right of centre press in this country would like to see a Conservative Government. You get the feeling that the only reason the Murdoch press has backed New Labour for 10 years in because the Tories were so unbackable in the shape they were in.

But let's look at a couple of the tabloid stories today in The Sun.

Firstly we have a piece entitled: "Is Cabinet biased to the North?".

This piece by The Sun's political editor reports how all those "hardworking Southerners fund Northerners and Scots". Describing the South East as the "engine room" of Britain and presumably the rest of the UK being portrayed as spongers.

Apparently only two Cabinet Ministers live South of Watford. Now I agree we should encourage a situation where a high percentage of Cabinet Ministers originate from the great town of Watford - but at a more serious level, this report pays scant attention to the fact that the vast majority of Cabinet Ministers (and other MPs) actually spend the majority of their week living in London. It's not like they are somehow marooned in their constituencies unaware of what is going on in the South East and the capital in particular.

The Scots come in for particular ire from The Sun:

"Amazingly, the Scots don't actually spend all their £30 billion handout each year. They are so awash with taxpayers cash they don't know what to spend it on. Frustrated southerners have to put up with lousy commuter trains, gridlocked roads, sky-high living costs and it is becoming virtually impossible for university graduates to get a foot on the bottom rung of the housing ladder."

This is then followed by the singularly most made up quote seen in The Sun for at least a week:

"Supporters of the status quo hit back by saying everyone in the South has a choice. They could up sticks and move to the north if they don’t like their lot."

I've never been a particular fan of Francis Rossi's band, but it's also interesting to note that even in that sentence that has gushed from both the mind and keyboard of a wisened old Tory hack that "the South" is capitalised and "the north" is not. How very revealing.

The South East England-centric right of centre tabloid press has it's perfect heroes in the South East England-centric right of centre Tory Party. The Tories couldn't care less about public services, deprivation or unemployment for the ordinary working man (as they proved throughout the 80s and early 90s) - all they are worried about is having enough money for their private education, private healthcare and private businesses; securing power for their own ends; and keeping money within the South East for themselves.

No wonder they get beggar all votes in Scotland, Wales and an area referred to generically as "the north".

But this mini Tory revival is what some in the media have been desperate for. The fact this selfish me, me, me, culture of politics in the Tory Party is beginning to thrive again sets their greedy little hearts racing.

Let's look further on in The Sun today to Page 11 where Kelvin Mackenzie is the voice of reason (sadly not available online) with a piece entitled: "Why I Hate The McBottle Brothers".

"I hate them with a passion. The McBottle Brothers, Brown and Darling. I even found myself shouting at the radio when the panda man was telling his lies on Radio 4's Today Programme. I detest their cynicism. I detest them for their deceit. I detest them for their lack of understanding of English people and what motivates them.

"Perhaps they can only think like the Scots - in that case, why don't they go home and bugger up their own country and leave ours alone."

Yes, Kelvin. Send them all back.

That is the problem with the Tory mindset. They forget that the UK is made up of 4 countries: Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and, yes, England.

If you come from anywhere outside of the South East/London, they don't care. More than that, they resent you for it and for you having the temerity to speak to them about the needs of your community. You must be stealing all the money they want to keep for themselves.

You see, in the Tory vision of the UK, everyone is equal - but some are more equal than others.

However they have clearly calculated that if you do not live in the South East they do not need your votes. So don't disappoint them. Ensure you never vote Tory ever again, and see how they deal with 10 more years of opposition.
-


Display: Sort:

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#1)

Why blame the press?  It was not the Sun or any other media group that told Brown to announce Douglas Alexander as his election co-ordinator on the day he was coronated as Labour leader and then spin to the media their would be a early election.  Nobody forced Brown or his advisors to talk up the prospects of an early election, he could have called the speculation off.  Who told him to goto Iraq for that disgraceful exercise in spin?  Is it any wonder there is a media backlash?

Brown is going to have to take it on the chin.  Also I did not see to many of us complaining when all of the media was praising Brown and Labour in the summer.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#2)

Good piece Kerron.

Perhaps we should set up some kind of 'mediawatch' group? 

I could not beleive how during the Northern Rock crisis the Daily Mail called it a Black Monday and had a black masthead around it... they were loving the fact that it was hurting Labour, even though it was actually their actions like that which were driving crowds to withdraw savings.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#3)

I like the way that MM didn't actually address any of the points raised - just wanted a little rant. Perhaps I touched a nerve.

You may also enjoy this piece I have just written:

http://kerroncross.blogspot.com/2007/10/is-shadow-cabinet-biased-to-south.html

It asks whether the Shadow Cabinet is biased to the South because the vast majority of their MPs have constituencies there.

I wonder if The Sun will run a piece on that tomorrow?

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#4)

Great post Kerron.

With regards to the media, we face a constant uphill struggle all the time - the vast majority of our national newspapers are right-wing. And the only time they support us is if the Tories are in a complete mess or if we do something conservative (like scrapping supercasinos, cutting taxes or recriminalising cannabis).

Tories moan endlessly about how the BBC is against them, but the reality of the situation is most of the media hate Labour and progressive ideologies.

What chance do we have when we've only got the Guardian, the Independent (which is more for the LibDems) and the Daily Mirror coming from our side of the story? And we've got the Daily Scum (Mail), the Daily Filth (Express), Daily Torygraph, The Times, The FT, The Sun, The NOTW, the Daily Star, The People etc. all going coming from a right-wing perspective. It doesn't help when even local papers like the London Evening Standard are right-wing too.

But the most troubling aspect I've found is how television news is becoming increasingly right-wing. OK, the BBC is generally quite liberal in its outlook I agree, and Channel 4 is basically the broadcasting station for the LibDems. But as I've already pointed out, Question Time is basically 50 minutes of inciting hatred against Labour. And quite what has happened to ITV News lately I don't know. Tom Bradby seems to fall over himself lavishing praise on Cameron and his dislike for Labour is obvious for all to see. ITV News is now basically like the Daily Express read out loud. Sky News (naturally, being owned by Murdoch) tilts to the right too.

Even the blogosphere is dominated by right-wingers: ConHome, Iain Dale, Guido all being the most famous political blogs in this country.

So with regards to the media, we will always face a tough task and it's sad because it makes our country look more conservative than it actually is. Every election, a majority always votes for a progressive party (Labour or LibDems or even Greens) and yet because of the voting methods and because of our incredibly biased media, the UK comes across as highly conservative.

It's a great shame, but we just have to fight harder and shout louder to make sure we get heard and succeed.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#5)

Its always a mistake to take on the Press; you have to learn to live with them. On the whole they they reflect public opinion, as they did on this occasion, 'the election that never came'.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#6)

I'd have to say, I think it's more that they reflect those who shout loudest rather than reflect public opinion.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#7)

If i hadn't read it twice you would never convince me a true socialist would ever have written that...

Next week, no point voting... (smilie meaning contempt and despair).

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#8)

I agree with Northernmonkey here.

I am deeply disturbed at the media 'agenda'. They are in it not to hold to account, or generate genuine debate on issues, but to sensationalise and gain viewers (BBC) or sell advertising (newspapers, ITV , SKY).

To me Question time has become unwatchable and was again last night. there is no sense of moderation from Dimbleby, who interjects (and thereby undermines) into Labour answers. The former-editor of the Sun last night, was more than rude in his 'impersonation' of Gordon Brown last night, it was borderline Scottish racism.

Look at the issue of a referendum of the European Treaty. If we did go ahead with it - there would never ever be a free and fair debate because most of the media has already made its mind up to be against the treaty. The public would never get an unvarnished opportunity to look at the facts on the issue.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#9)

You're right wilberforce,

Question Time was vile again last night but for different reasons. Kelvin MacKenzie's comments last night were racist undoubtedly and it will only stir up greater tensions between Scotland and England. Dimbleby should have intervened but yet again, didn't. There's a surprise.

For MacKenzie to say that only the London and the SE contribute anything and are the only ones with entrepeneurial zeal is pretty abyssmal. The rest of the UK isn't allowed to progress because everything ends up going to London. The South East is like a great big black hole sucking up the money from the rest of the country - like the £16bn which is going on Crossrail for example.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#13)

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%" border="0"><tr><td>
We are not the only ones upset by Mackenzie's remarks on Question Time. Having seen this, I too am going to file a complaint with the BBC. Its about time they were raked over the coals - Dimpleby should have to answer for not stepping in.... For me, Mackenzie imitation of gordon Brown deserves mention as well, it was unbelieveble.

I hope more people here will complain to the BBC over this.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/12/nkelv112.xml

The BBC has been was inundated with complaints after Kelvin MacKenzie, the former editor of The Sun, made disparaging comments about Scottish people on Question Time.

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="208" align="right" border="0"><tr><td width="8" rowspan="2"> </td><td width="200"></td></tr><tr><td class="caption"> </td></tr></table>

MacKenzie, who is notorious for his forthright opinions, provoked outrage after he claimed that the Scots lacked entrepreneurial skills and enjoyed spending but not making money.


He was shouted down and booed by the studio audience as he attacked Gordon Brown for being “a socialist Scot who wants to spend every single penny you earn. Never forget that.”


Challenged by another panellist, Chuka Umunna of the think tank Compass, Mr MacKenzie went on: “Scotland believes not in entrepreneurialism like in London and the South East.


“He [Brown] could not find anybody who could carry his bag better than another Scot, so he grabbed Darling [The Chancellor] from wherever he was.


“The reality is that the Scots enjoy spending it, they do not enjoy creating it, which is the opposite of down in the South.”


His comments, which were made on Thursday evening, drew 200 complaints to the BBC and were condemned by Scottish businessmen.

</td></tr></table>

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#10)

Crossrail is subject to the Barnett Formula, which means that whatever is spent on Crossrail, Wales, Scotland and NI get the same extra, per head of population.  Alistair Darling confirmed this two days ago. Same goes for the olympics. 
McKenzie was wheeled out by the BBC so it appeared to be a racist issue.  It is not.  It is a democratic issue and Gordon Brown has no democratic mandate to rule England, now that Scotland has its own Parliament and separate, domestic government.
To simplify it for the realy stupid - It is like the board of directors of Tesco and Sainsburys sitting on the board of directors for Morrisons and telling them what they must stock and who they can sell to.  Obviously those directors have the interests of their own supermarkets in mind.
Gordon Brown signed the Scottish Claim to Right, pledging to always to treat Scottish interests as paramount in everything he does.  This man is now ruling England and denying life saving cancer drugs to people in my country, whilst at the same time, taxing those people to supply them to his own nation for free.  The Scots do not pay top up fees, yet their politicians forced them onto the English.  The scots get free personal care, whilst England's pensioners are forced to sell their homes for such.
The list goes on.
When you have minorities ruling over the majority placing a lower price tag on the lives of that majority, you have apartheid rule. 
The Labour government is guilty of institutionalised manslaughter.  They are deliberately allowing people in my country to die, for want of life saving drugs available to the rest of the UK - and indeed, the rest of the EU.
England's MPs should hang their head in shame - but all they can do, is scream racist, like 21st century witch-hunters, who use name calling to silence objections.
HOME RULE FOR ENGLAND - AND PAY BACK IS DUE TO THE LABOUR PARTY FOR THEIR HATE CRIMES

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#15)

You're not that same annoying person who calls himself 'Englandism' or something like that are you?

I doubt you'll get much sympathy for your views on here. Firstly, if you think there's a problem with the Barnett formula then fair enough. But MacKenzie's comments last night went far further than that and were blatantly racist. He was basically saying Scottish people are backward and somehow inferior to people from London and the South East. Replace the word 'Scottish' with 'Pakistani' and he'd be in a lot of trouble.

Secondly, since we are the United Kingdom then anybody from the United Kingdom is allowed to be Prime Minister. England is not a separate sovereign country and therefore it does not have to be an Englishman who rules over us. You may not like this, but that's reality so get over it. And you're not going to win many friends for your argument with that hate-filled attitude you've got either.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#17)

Typical Labour response.
No, I am not Englandism. 
Yes, McKenzie is a nasty racist.  You obviously did not read my post properly, because it was made clear that McKenzie reduced the current democratic deficit to a racist issue, when it is not.  It is a democratic issue.
Yes, Gordon Brown has a democratic right to be the Prime Minister of the UK and he was elected by his Scottish constituents to represent them at UK level. 
He was NEVER elected to rule England.  No one in England can vote for or against him.  This is nothing to do with his nation of birth.  This is EVERYTHING to do with his constituency.  He is a Scottish MP, because he was elected to a Scottish constituency.  Malcolm Rifkind is an English MP, even though his also Scottish by birth, because he was elected to an English constituency.
If its complicated for you, you can thank Gordon for that.  He's the one who screwed up our democracy and imposed his version of autocracy on us. 
Which part of democracy don't the Labour Party understand?  Frank Field gets it easy enough.  Ask him to explain it to you, because it's what we're all talking about in the workplace and in our homes.  
And where is the list of sacrifices that Jack Straw said the English had to make in order to keep the Scots in the Union?

Instead of going down the Alistair Campbell route of name calling, why don't you explain to the people of England why they are not allowed the same life/ sight saving drugs that the people in Scotland get?

And what decent person wouldn't query the murderous Barnett Formula?  What kind of people are our English taxes funding, when they don't give two hoots for the lives of their constituents, but prefer to use their energies name calling those who only want fairness and equal rights to life in the UK?

Have YOU spoken out loud to defend those who have been condemned to lingering deaths in England, for want of life saving drugs given freely to those in Scotland?
Have YOU spoken out in defence of our babies, who are not given the same tests for cystic fibrosis - all Scottish babies are tested automatically at birth for this illness, but Gordon says that he will not pay for English babies to be tested at birth.
Do YOU think that is fair?  Will YOU continue to name call or will you speak out like a decent human being would?

 


Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#11)

"You see, in the Tory vision of the UK, everyone is equal - but some are more equal than others."

 

No - actually that's the Labour attitude. Everybody is equal but Scots are more equal than others. Scots get more money. Scots MPs get to vote on purely English matters, so Labour can drive through purely English laws even if a majority of English MPs are against them.

 

And as for right-wing press - puh-leeze! How many British journalists would support, for example, reduced "gun control" laws (even though they demonstrably don't work)? And the left-wing bias of the BBC, paying for which is please note compulsory even if you don't agree with it, gets more blatant every day.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#16)

Oh yes, because of course Thatcher and Major both rejected the Barnett formula when they were in power didn't they?

Tories want to see an end to the UK just so they can dominate England in some sort of perpetual hegemony.

And why are Tories so obsessed with the BBC? There's far more to the media than just the BBC you know. The vast majority of people in this country don't like to watch trash like ITV News or read filth like the Daily Express. Balance and diversity is good, but alas most of our media are owned by right-wingers with a conservative agenda on their mind. Tories seem to want to get rid of the BBC so all the media will broadcast the news from a conservative perspective. I suggest you try watching Fox News - it's right up your street.


Just for the record, after scanning through ConHome today, I found Mr. Swanson made this comment: "socialism has caused far more suffering in the world than racism", so I think that just about sums up what kind of lunatic this Tory is.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#12)

Jack Straw said the English must be prepared to make sacrifices to keep the Scots in the Union.
Can we have a list of these sacrifices in the next Labour manifesto so we can decide for ourselves and vote accordingly?
And please tell us how many Labour MPs have sacrificed the lives of their loved ones on the altar of Unionism?  How many have personally chosen to go blind with macular degeneration, which the English are not allowed drugs for?  Not one, I suspect.
I can tell you lot in the Westminster bubble that fury is growing on the streets of England and I speak as a northerner and EX Labour Party voter.
Gordon Brown has no mandate to rule my country and democracy is bigger than a Scotsman's career ambitions and more important than the ambitions those troughing at McDowning Streets table.
It's time to defend our dying and time for the Labour Party (and the so-called opposition parties) to apologise and explain why people in England have had to die in the name of Scotland.

Re: Standard of Reporting Goes South (#14)

A good piece Kerron and I agree that the press has always been difficult for Labour, that it always will be, and that Kelvin Mackenzie is particular is disgraceful (he shouldn't have been allowed to get away with his racist comments on telly last night).


But your piece is strangely timed. For all Gordon's troubles recently he has shown a superb ability to square the press. The Sun's Mr Pascoe-Watson is still sympathetic, and much of the Mail and Telegraph's output recently has been pro-Gordon. Mr Maguire in the Mirror is a great Gordon supporter, as is (or was until today) la Toynbee on the Guardian.


The reason why the media has been attacking Labour in the last week is because Labour has screwed up. For once, we can't just "blame the media". The deferred election, after the Bournemouth spinning, was a terrible screw-up. Allowing the Conservative conference to turn into a triumph was another one. The pre-budget report, aping the Conservatives' policies, capped it.


Personally I think Labour can recoved from all this in time, and win the next election. But I don't think there is any point trying to cover up or minimise the mistakes that have been made. On the contrary, once we admit the mistakes it becomes easier to move on.