Selection investigation fails to inspire confidence

From this week's Tribune. The latest on the NEC Inquiry into Worsley and Eccles South, with new information about the problems in that selection. Plus the NEC's decisions on which Labour held seats where the MP is retiring, will be open or all women shortlists.

Selection investigation fails to inspire confidence

Barckley Sumner

HOPES that an investigation into allegations of rule-breaking in Worsley and Eccles South would force Labour to tighten its selection procedures are diminishing.

Labour's National Executive Committee announced an inquiry after revelations in last week's Tribune of a host of alleged rule breaches in the selection contest between sitting MPs Barbara Keeley and Ian Stewart for the redrawn constituency. Many of the complaints made by Mr Stewart concern the alleged misbehaviour of party staff, who should remain neutral.
Despite this, a Labour spokesperson has confirmed that the three party officials named in the complaint will all continue to work on parliamentary selections while the inquiry is ongoing. The spokesperson added: "They [the inquiry team] are not investigating individual officers."

When asked if this amounted to a watering down of the inquiry, NEC chair Mike Griffiths said: "That is bullshit."

 Attention now turns to the contest in Morley and Outwood between sitting MPs Colin Challen and Ed Balls. The contest is due to the abolition of Mr Balls' Normanton seat, around a third of which transfers into the new constituency. Mr Challen represents Morley and Rothwell. Barrie Grunewald, the Yorkshire regional director, named in Mr Stewart's complaint, intends to begin the process today (Friday January 26), immediately after the new constituency's inauguralmeeting.

Meanwhile, following a call to Tribune, Ms Keeley inadvertently revealed fresh contentions. She admits that, on the eve of the distribution of ballot papers, she challenged the eligibility of 15 members from Mr Stewart's Eccles constituency. After an emergency meeting, it was discovered that nine members from her own Worsley constituency were also not entitled to vote. Ms Keeley conceded that the members in question "were in membership arrears". Despite this, party staff had initially been content to issue them with ballot papers.

At Tuesday's (January 23) NEC organisation sub-committee, it was agreed not to endorse Andrew Pakes as Labour's candidate in Milton Keynes North. The matter will be discussed again in March, following official complaints about the conduct of the hustings meeting.

 The organisation sub-committee also agreed which seats where Labour MPs have announced their retirement will be open or all-women shortlists. Open selections will be held in Bolton South East, Brighton Kemptown, Bristol North West, Easington and Swansea West. All women shortlists will be in place in Brighton Pavilion, Selby (a Tory marginal on newboundaries) and Sunderland Central.

The decision on whether Ealing Southall - where Piara Khabra is retiring - will select from an all-women shortlist, has been deferreduntil March.


Display: Sort:

Re: Selection invesitgation (#1)

"Open selections will be held in Bolton South East, Brighton Kemptown, Bristol North West, Easington and Swansea West. All women shortlists will be in place in Brighton Pavilion, Selby (a Tory marginal on newboundaries) and Sunderland Central"

and Leeds West (which generated much discussion here on LabourHome)?
And Birmingham Ladywood?

"The decision on whether Ealing Southall - where Piara Khabra is retiring - will select from an all-women shortlist, has been deferreduntil March."

why was the decision delayed?

Re: Selection invesitgation (#2)

As I understand it the decision in Leeds West will be made in May after the locla elections.

The decision about Birmingham Ladywood will be made in March.

The decision on Ealing Southall was delayed due to conflicing signals from the local party

Re: Selection invesitgation (#3)

Many thanks Barckley Sumner.

It was reported here on LabourHome that Ealing Southall GC voted for an AWS. I wonder where the signals against an AWS are coming from.

Always related to selections (and contests between MPs), do you know what is the situation in Knowsley area? There're more sitting MPs than seats MPs there.

Re: Selection invesitgation (#4)

Not sure about Knowsley entirely but will check and come back to you.
I understadn there might have been another meeting in Ealing Southall which took a different view.

Re: Selection invesitgation (#7)

I may have an answer to this - under the current rules AWS are used in order to meet the target of each region (and nation) having at least 35% of sitting Labour MPs being women.

Thing is London meets this target, so in theory there shouldn't be any AWS in London at the next election (even if CLPs wouldn't particularly mind them).

On a broader level the NEC seems to be doing the absolute minimum AWS - not having one in Easington (the NE has the lowest level of women MPs of all regions) is close to making the process a joke.

Re: Selection invesitgation (#8)

"I may have an answer to this - under the current rules AWS are used in order to meet the target of each region (and nation) having at least 35% of sitting Labour MPs being women."

Oh, thanks pregethwr.

"Thing is London meets this target, so in theory there shouldn't be any AWS in London at the next election (even if CLPs wouldn't particularly mind them)"

I see that London has 36.36% women among sitting Labour MPs.

Selection invesitgation (#5)

I spoke with a couple of NEC members last night and was told that members were v annoyed by the conduct of some party officials / staff and that the outcome of the inquiry was far from certain.

Andrea - I also heard that Leeds W and B/Ladywood were discussed but thought to be too controversial to call at the moment although they have both been pencilled in as all women short lists.

Selection invesitgation (#6)

She admits that, on the eve of the distribution of ballot papers, she challenged the eligibility of 15 members from Mr Stewart's Eccles constituency. After an emergency meeting, it was discovered that nine members from her own Worsley constituency were also not entitled to vote. Ms Keeley conceded that the members in question "were in membership arrears".

A cynic might assume here that someone's ashamed at how many members have either resigned from the party or not renewed their membership. Of course, an intelligent (and impartial) observer might wonder whether ditching the current venal leadership as early as humanly possible might not be a better (and more sustainable) way of regaining lost members. (A grovelling apology for not doing so earlier wouldn't hurt either).

Re: Selection invesitgation (#9)

Doesn't say much for the health of the local Labour Party when one-tenth of the entire electorate for the selection contest were barred from voting because their membership had lapsed!

Then again, this is the same Worsley Labour Party who had to employ a delivery company to deliver their main election address in wards where they have sitting councillors!

Re: Selection invesitgation (#10)

"Then again, this is the same Worsley Labour Party who had to employ a delivery company to deliver their main election address in wards where they have sitting councillors! "

and it's also the same Worsley Labour Party that held all their seats up for re-election last year.

Re: Selection invesitgation (#11)

Well, of the five Salford wards in the current Worsley constituency, only one could have been considered a real marginal in 2006, and in that ward (Walkden South) Labour managed to lose a ward in which they had topped the poll in 2004 by nearly 500 votes...

Re: Selection invesitgation (#12)

yes, they performed badly in Walkden South. It's undeniable.
However their vote held well in other wards. In Winton they held their seat comfortably against the Libdems (who seemed the ones having peformed worse in the Worsley wards, btw). The tories made big progresses just in Cadishead where there wasn't a LD candidate though (making comparisons more difficult)

Re: Selection invesitgation (#13)

The LibDems have fallen apart completely in west Salford generally.

They had Councillors in Worsley & Boothstown until 2004, but now they are in third place in Boothstown & Ellenbrook and the Conservative majority in the new Worsley ward is the largest in the City for any party. They were a good third in Walkden South in 2004 and their vote crumbled in 2006. They had a Councillor elected in Eccles in 2004 (who sadly died soon afterwards) but that seat is now the top Conservative target in the City and the LDs are nowhere. They didn't even field a candidate in Cadishead last year as you say.

As for Winton, the 2004 result was a vote for John Pooley rather than the Liberal Democrats, and it will be interesting to see whether he can hold on this year. Even if he does, he won't push any of his colleagues through with him in future years.

I know that the Conservative campaign is much stronger into 2007 than it was in 2006, and it is saying a lot that the Labour Party is more concerned with holding Walkden North than trying to get a seat back in Walkden South. They even panicked and managed to get the last Conservative newsletter into the press - see here.

Re: Selection invesitgation (#14)

Is this really the place to be discussing Labour's electoral chances with the Conservative candidate (and sitting councillor) for one of the wards concerned?

Re: Selection investigation (#15)

re Sunderland Central - there's not a retiring MP there?

Re: Selection investigation (#17)

Bill Etherington (currently MP for Sunderland North) is retiring. That's why Sunderland Central needs to select a new candidate.

Sharon Hodgson (currently MP for Gateshead) is also seatless as she lost the selection for Gateshead against David Clelland (currently MP for Tyne Bridge). So maybe she can try in Sunderland Central.

Re: Selection investigation (#18)

Bill Etherington is retiring, but Chris Mullen isn't and is trying to get selected in Sunderland Central. So info must be wrong re Sunderland Central being AWS

Re: Selection investigation (#19)

You should ask Barckley Sumner.
If it's true that the NEC has decided an AWS in Sunderland Central, it means that it has been considered as a vacant seat. That would suggest that Mullin has applied for Houghton and Sunderland South.

I've no clue on who has applied where. I was just basing on the main article info

Re: Selection investigation (#20)

A confession is in order the vacant seat in the north east is Wasington and Sunderland West as Chris Mullin, who has been selected in Sunderland Central has just pointed out to me.
I understand there was confusion at the NEC meeting on this subject.

Re: Selection investigation (#21)

So Barckley Sumner, is the Sunderland situation the following?
Sunderland Central...Chris Mullin
Houghton and Sunderland South...Fraser Kemp
Wasington and Sunderland West...vacant

Re: Selection investigation (#22)

Yes. That is the latest I understand.

Re: Selection investigation (#23)

Thanks. It also makes sense.

Ealing Southall (#16)

More on Ealing Southall AWS or not controversy in Ealing local paper:
http://www.ealingtimes.co.uk/news/localnews/display.var.1152059.0.we_need_more_asian_women_mps.php

Khabra is supporting an AWS.
A petitions against AWS has been sent to the NEC. People against AWS claim that there's no strong enough woman for the seat and that with a woman they'll lose it to the tories.
Khabra replied saying they're talking rubbish