Alex's Conference Diary: Gordon Brown brings it on


Gordon started off with a lot of effusive praise of the PM and no less than six mentions of Tony's name in the first ten minutes of his speech to Labour Conference.

Quite surprisingly, he made no mention of his brief, the economy, until some time into his speech, concentrating first on foreign affairs and then education.


There were plainly a number of audiences for this speech and the conference floor was not the highest among them. Potential leadership contenders were named and supported and in this sense he seemed to stamp his authority on both them and the party.

Also high on the audience list was the media. Gordon specifically addressed - again and again - matters relating to his character, the main perceived source of weakness in his bid for the leadership. Despite an overt theme of rights and responsibilities, he again returned to a very personal description of his family life and how it catalysed his involvement in politics.

It won't pass note that he again announced that policy aspiration that state school spending per pupil will rise to match the £8,000 spent on each pupil in private education, though he has announced this before a number of times to my recollection.

There did seem to be a barb or two for number 10 - particularly with his references to decentralising power to parliament and to local government - and particularly pointed was his suggestion that the government should be divorced from political appointments - did he have peerages and other honours in mind?

The reception from the party members was gushing. Outside the GMEX, members and delegates were effusive in their expression of their fondness for him and his personal desire to take on Cameron seemed to fill the audience with a taste for the battle ahead.

In that hall we were all comrades - though not quite all if Bloomberg is to be believed.

The comments attributed to Cherie - that Gordon was lying - are either true - in which case I can't imagine how better the shine could have been taken off is speech, or the Bloomberg journalist was mistaken - in which case it's another example of how the mainstream media is obsessed with frippery and uninterested in policy.

Gordon Brown's speech did one thing that will not please every member of the party. The spotlight is again, firmly on the looming succession.


Display: Sort:

Re: Gordon Brown brings it on (#1)

Alex, do you feel that actual and potential leadership contenders should get the chance to address conference in a similar manner?  One could try and work out how much of Gordon's speech was a leadership hustings speech and how much was a Chancellor's conference speech and give other candidates a speech the length of the hustings bit, if they declare as a candidate.  Otherwise it seems a trifle unfair!

(I realise this won't happen, but just hypothetically or as a point for future reference, there does appear to be an institutional advantage for Gordon here...)

Re: Gordon Brown brings it on (#2)

No I don't feel that anyone who wants to be leader should be accorded the same status as the Chancellor of the Exchequer until the election process begins, at which time i would want to see a very fair contest.

Re: Gordon Brown brings it on (#3)

Clearly not, Alex.  But turn the question round - should the Chancellor of the Exchequer be afforded a leadership hustings speech denied to his opponents?  Do we need, in future, to put some parameters on the subjects of keynote addresses, which are a privelage after all.

Re: Gordon Brown brings it on (#4)

"Clearly not, Alex.  But turn the question round - should the Chancellor of the Exchequer be afforded a leadership hustings speech denied to his opponents? "

The other potential contenders who are in the Cabinet have the same opportunity (not sure if they'll have the same media attention though). It's backbenchers who don't have this opportunity.