200 MPs sign EDM on Cuba

In the same week that the Bush administration has adopted a much trumpeted plan to force regime change in Cuba, 200 MPs from all parties have now signed a Commons motion calling on the UK and Europe to improve their relations with the island.

Early Day Motion 1959 entitled `EU Common Position on Cuba,' tabled by Ian Gibson MP, Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary group on Cuba, places a third of MPs firmly at odds with the Bush administration. This comes just days after US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, announced a series of new measures aimed "to respond" rapidly to force regime change in the event of the death of Cuba's President Fidel Castro, who turns 80 in August. The EDM contains an explicit rejection of the Bush administration's "Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba", which is recommending that the White House steps up its pressure on both Cuba and the international community to support its plans for the eventual overthrow of the Cuban system. These plans, documented in the Commission's report released on Monday 10 July include the creation of an $80m (£43m) fund to "promote democracy" in Cuba and promote unrest by destabilising the islands economy. Ian Gibson MP says: "Apart from being a clear breach of the UN Charter, it is a course of action that will be rejected by the vast majority of Cubans. The outcome will almost certainly be conflict in the island. Such an event would destroy peace and stability in the Caribbean and will severely affect the interests of European powers with interests there. Cuba poses no threat to any other nation and its right to self determination should be protected." The Commission Report falls short of recommending US military action in Cuba but contains recommendations which "for reasons of national security and effective implementation" are contained in a seperate "classified annex". Observers believe  that this suggests the US has concrete plans for a military option if the `peaceful transition' does not take place. Analysts say the problem is that the Commission disregards the fact that the present Cuban government is extremely popular and that the majority of Cubans will reject any US prescribed plan for their future. Conflict is seen as highly likely as a result. CSC Director Rob Miller commented: "The whole Commission Report reeks of hypocrisy. The US talks of allowing the Cubans to make up their own minds about what government they want, but then it proposes all kinds of internal meddling and outside coercion to ensure that the only option available is a government that suits Washington." "The fact that the Bush Plan is going to use economic bullying to punish other countries that do not support the plan is completely unacceptable and should be opposed by everyone in the UK.

We are still extremely concerned that the FCO will not  disclose the content of meetings they had in November with Caleb McCarry, the US "Cuba Transition Co-ordinator" when he was in the UK to lobby the British government to support US plans for regime change in Cuba. Our Government should cease to meet with people who are intent on breaking international law and using coercion and military intervention to overthrow  other governments" Notes to editors: 1 Cuba Transition Coordinator Caleb McCarry and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice released the second report of the Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba and the Compact with the Cuban People in Washington on Monday July 10th. The full report is available at http://www.cafc.gov/rpt/

2 200 MPs from across the parties have signed Early Day Motion 1959 in the British Parliament on the "EU Common Position on Cuba." The motion "calls on the United Kingdom Government to maintain and develop its independent approach of positive engagement towards Cuba." The full text of the motion, proposed by Ian Gibson MP, and a full list of signatures can be found at http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=30440&SESSION=875

3 The Cuba Solidarity Campaign (CSC) is a non-party-political campaign that works in the UK to raise awareness of the illegal US blockade of Cuba, and defend the Cuban people's right to self-determination. Its patrons include Harold Pinter, Ken Livingstone and Tony Benn. Its website can be found at www.cuba-solidarity.org.uk Contact: Natasha Hickman 0207 263 6452, Rob Miller 07930 693900 or office@cuba-solidarity.org.uk



Display: Sort:

Re: 200 MPs sign EDM on Cuba (#1)

It's good to see that more and more politicians are prepared to stand up against the US's impearealist (sp?) aggression. This is just another example in the seemingly endless string of cases in which America sticks it's nose in where, frankly, it is neither needed nor wanted. Cuba may not be perfect, but if the Cuban people want change, then it is they who must initiate it, not Washington. I would hope that many in the Labour Party feel the same way.

Re: 200 MPs sign EDM on Cuba (#5)

It's good to see that more and more politicians are prepared to stand up against the US's impearealist (sp?) aggression.

Believe it or not but Cubans are individual human beings, theoretically equal to me and you. As such they deserve to elect their own government in a democracy not to have a government imposed upon them by Castro's dictatorship. Take off your anti-American blinkers and start to care more for the people of Cuba who are denied their basic human rights. As we speak brave Cubans are rotting in jail, their crime? To dare to seek democratic accountability as citizens. Shame on you for neglecting their suffering and for failing to support democratic progression. Your ignorance of human rights is not unique; this twisted logic and amoral foreign policy view is littered all over the European continent. While you enjoy your freedom others are rotting and your response - not only to turn a blind eye but to see and support repression; you should be ashamed. I for one wish you were in a Cuban jail; maybe you would then have some comprehension for the values of humanity. I'm proud of the American government and people for unconditionally supporting democratic development around the World. The fact that we are even debating this just shows the pathetic standards that much of Europe has fallen to.

The principle reason of my personal happiness is that I live in a free country where I can choose my own destiny and live my life by my values in relative safety and security. That's also the reason why millions of refugees seek a better life in the UK and in the USA (many from Cuba). Unlike the people of Cuba I am not jailed for expressing an opinion and I am not denied the freedom of international travel by an unelected dictator. Yet alongside my personal happiness I also contain a passion of care and understanding for other people who share my potential but lack the opportunities that I enjoy from living in a free country.

Don't you see that your view coincides with the mentality of right-wing bigots? You need to ask yourself a few searching questions. Do you have principles, if so what are they and how can they be improved? I only hope that you (and others with your view) are brave enough to question your own views instead of taking the easy option and jumping on the anti-American platform.

It's very easy to judge the World through the prism of major historical events, particularly American wrongs such as Vietnam and the CIA coup in Chile. But I don't seek to judge the morality of government policy by the past mistakes of previous generations. I don't hold Germans responsible for Hitler's Nazi crusade and I don't hold Japanese people responsible for their fascist ideology played out in WW2. You need to assess the rights and wrong's of the World now in 2006 not jump to long conceived bias.

If you believe in democracy, equality, human rights, the rule of law and the right of Cubans to enjoy the freedoms that we do (such as blogging and debate) then you support democratic change in Cuba (as America is doing), you do not appease it. I can't deny or suppress the contempt in which I hold your current immoral and bankrupt views.

Re: 200 MPs sign EDM on Cuba (#2)

"Analysts say the problem is that the Commission disregards the fact that the present Cuban government is extremely popular"

An opinion clearly not shared by the Cuban government itself, otherwise it would have no problems with holding free elections, or indeed with letting people leave the country.

"defend the Cuban people's right to self-determination"

By trying to promote democracy, the US is doing more to support this than all the politicians in Europe put together, although if they are trying to "promote unrest by destabilising the islands economy" it's difficult to understand what they could do that a Socialist regime wouldn't do first.

This support for a one-party totalitarian state should be repellent to everybody who genuinely believes in democracy, though of course this feeling is not a novelty to those of us who talked to Labour activists during the Cold War.

Re: 200 MPs sign EDM on Cuba (#3)

200 friends of an unelected military dictatorship that has denied its own people the right to a representative government for half-a-century.

200 friends of a regime that harrasses or imprisons dissidents, impoverishes their families and violates their human rights.

200 friends of a prison island whose citizens are prevented from freely leaving.

200 friends of regime that makes life very uncomfortable for those who exercise their civil and political rights or wish to follow their religious convictions.

200 friends of a police state.

Shame on them.

Re: 200 MPs sign EDM on Cuba (#4)

All true. Just because Bush doesn't like it, doesn't mean the Cuban regime should have our support.

Didn't Castro try to persuade Khrushchev to launch nuclear weapons at America during the Cuban Missile Crisis? We wouldn't be sat here discussing this if he'd had his way!

Shame on everyone who signed it.