This murder was an act of terrorism

I am not a criminologist. However, anecdotally, I understand it is common for premeditated murderers to try to cover their tracks.

Yet in the case of Alexander Litvinenko's assassination, it is clear that his death was only one intended outcome. Perhaps the more significant goal was to send a message to others around the world that they can be found and despatched in the most gruesome and painful of manners.


This murder was no ordinary homicide, it was a "Hollywood" assassination and designed to inspire terror. Not only was Litvinenko targeted, but anyone who came in contact with him was at risk. What if he had got so sick that he had thrown up a chunk of polonium 210 in Piccadilly? This was of no concern to the assassin.

And the nature of polonium 210 is itself terror inducing. I won't repeat what has been said in the mainstream media about the substance, but if you ever wanted to know what the government means when they refer to a "dirty" nuclear bomb, they are talking about something like polonium 210 packed with an explosive.

The terror threat for us is that this substance is at large on our streets; that somebody has agents in London able to build and deploy a dirty nuclear bomb, put it in a briefcase and leave it in a crowded place. It doesn't even have to be a large bomb, just big enough to spread thousands of particles of this dreadful poison.

This is why we must hope that our government brings to justice this killer and anyon else responsible for the execution of Alexander Litvinenko.

There has been a lot of tentative discussion about the likelihood of the Russian government being behind this assassination and the ramifications of this are very worrying indeed. Russian agents were accused of poisoning Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko before he was elected to that office. Furthermore, there has recently been a row with the former Soviet republic of Georgia, whose government named the Russian agents it accused of terrorist operations in South Ossetia.

Circumstantially, this puts the Russian government at number one in the list of suspects, not least because it is unthinkable that the polonium could have originated outside that small list of countries with the greatest nuclear expertise.

Yet if evidence does emerge that implicates Russia, that could trigger a diplomatic row that could take decades to heal. Who would be on our side? Would we seeks sanctions? Would Russia turn off the gas flow to Europe and freeze us into submission? Such an escalation could take us back to the cold war and force satellite countries to choose sides.

I can't imagine the international powers would allow matters to go that far, but if it emerges that "rogue elements" in the Russian security services are behind this murder, I for one will suspect a cover up.

This death of one British Citizen could yet be the most important death our generation witnesses. We can only hope Russia's hands are clean.


Display: Sort:

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#1)

Though I have my doubts as to the guilt of the russian government itself, afterall this man had little new information to offer, for sure, elements of the 'old guard' in russian politics and the Kremlin have their fingerprints on this brutal crime.

Sadly, you can be sure there be no explosive revelations implicating anybody of any significance because that would not be politically acceptable on either side.

But the russian people have not had the chance to embrace and experience democracy, the russian government should not be considered a friend, and its about time somebody wil some political clout grew a pair and said so publicly.

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#2)

My point was not that the murder was to silence Litvinenko, but that it may silence other dissidents at large.

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#3)

I understand that, but at one level or another, the russians have been doing this for decades, and it certainly hasn't has the intended effect.

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#4)

The likely suspect is Russia, but this is why I have problems with this. Surely they would not be so stupid as to risk major diplomatic rows with the West over a vicious incident which has put a no of lives at risk!

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#5)

Bear in mind that 'Russia' is a construct and that the reality of 'russian' politics is much more factional ,it is not simply emigre's v the State.
Both Berezovsky and Putin were originaly in the same faction and Abramovich osscilates between the two.

While polonium indicates acess to State owned resources it does not necessarily follow that the current head of state or his immediate circle had anything to do with it. The other key factor is that Putin is now in his final term unless he changes the constitution he will have to leave office soon.
I think it more likely that what we are seing is the power struggle for which faction takes over post Putin.

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#6)

What would become of the Labour Party if it transpires that a wealthy individual who had donated money to the Labour Party via a third party was implicated in the manslaughter of Alexander Litvinenko? But hey, enough of the small talk. We should be congratulating Labour stalwart Tony Robinson on setting up home with a young lady 35 years his junior. Good on you Tone.

Baldrick, aged 60, presents his new love of 25

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#7)

And this is relevant because... ? I guess to you it doesn't matter that a brutal murder has occured, cheap shots at Labour are much more important. A*se.

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#9)

In my experience, Labour people never hesitate to substitute cheap shots, or indeed just simple unjustified abuse, for serious debate when it suits them. Witness JP's "tossers" performance the other day. Don't whine when you're treated the same way.

Plus, if you really do want to convince your opponents of your case, gratuitous swearing is not likely to help. All it does is reveal your real, nasty and malicious, nature.

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#10)

Can we all be a bit more comradely here?

The baldrick comment was an amusing aside but utterly irrelevant to the story. Perhaps The Daily Pundit should write a new story on it?

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#8)

"We should be congratulating Labour stalwart Tony Robinson on setting up home with a young lady 35 years his junior. Good on you Tone"

And how is connected with the original story on this thread?
Maybe you should have open a new thread about it..something like "Love lives of former NEC members"

Re: This murder was an act of terrorism (#11)

First off, I shall apologise for the harsh nature of my first response, but as someone with a great interest in Russian politics, this case has hit me hard: I feel terribly sorry for those close to Mr. Litvinenko, and having someone come on here and use such a serious topic to take shots at Labour's policy is, in my view, reprehensible. Again, I apologise.

And as for "your real, nasty and malicious, nature", well, I'm so glad you could analyse me so well over the internet, Alex. Funnily enough, no one else has ever accused me of being those things, but I guess I shouldn't quarrell with you, you're bound to be right. If I ever need any more deep psychological anlysis, I shall be certain to look you up first.