Tory gets it wrong, nobody corrects him.
'He told BBC One's Question Time he had no evidence but the timing of the verdict was "deeply suspect".'
The words of one Malcolm Rifkind.
Maybe he should get his facts right before he comes onto national television and further makes a mockery of the facts thrown onto the public regarding Iraq.
Firstly, SADDAMS lawyers had also called for it to be postponed.
Secondly, it was delayed last month because of requests from the tribunal reviewing the stacks of evidence.
Indeed just a couple of days before the verdict the chief prosecutor was saying it might be delayed further.
If you think all these people were trying to help out the american government, you are subscribing to baseless conspiracy theories. The Iraqi government has been plenty combatitive to the Americans.
Not to mention, it would be a huge risk that could have backfired. Massive violence was expected, that thankfully didn't occur, but what if it had? I'd imagine another couple of seats would be lost for the GOP.
Saddam verdict timing 'suspect' (BBC)
Former Foreign Secretary Malcolm Rifkind has accused the US of delaying the verdict in Saddam Hussein's trial to coincide with the mid-term polls.
He told BBC One's Question Time he had no evidence but the timing of the verdict was "deeply suspect".
The former president of Iraq was this week sentenced to death by hanging for crimes against humanity.
The White House has dismissed similar accusations as "preposterous" and said the Iraqi judges determined the timing.


