The League of Parasites

No Tory MP's in the top 20?  No it's not a unpopularity contest, it's the league table of expenses claimed by MP's last year.  While Tory leader Dave Cameron claimed £135,700, the rest of his mob invariably claimed less than Lib Dem and Labour MP's.

At the top of The League of Parasites, as this immature blog shall call it, is Labour MP Eric Joyce, who claimed an astonishing 174,811 British Pounds.  That's a lot of coins to be sloshing back up to Falkirk.  The Guardian argues that £45,000 is negated as travel expenses, which leaves £130,000 for an MP whose constituency is already represented in the Scottish Parliament, not to mention the European Parliament.  

Conversely, at the more frugal end of The League of Parasites, Philip Hollobone (Kettering, Con) claims a mere £50k.  So where does the additional £80,000 go, Mr. Joyce?  Hmmm - that's a lot of Deep-fried Marsbars?

In the Scottish Parliament expense claims were slashed when transparency was introduced, with ministers justifying their claims.  Did you know that parliamentarians need not provide receipts for any purchases below £250?  That's a brand new iPod to you and me.  So if Mr. Joyce wanted one, he could fob off the value as some sundry expense and no one would ever question it.

Lib Dem'r Norman Baker, MP for Lewes, argued, "its actually better value than it is in many other countries such as America and most of the European countries."  That's great Mr. Baker, but aren't we recycling the excuses you used when explaining away the dishonesty behind Party Funding?  That: "we maybe be a bunch of scoundrels, but we're not as bad as those iniquitous continentals."   Such arguments don't wash with this blog, do they wash with you?

If thrifty Dennis Skinner (Bolsover, Lab) can get by on expenses of £67,706, can someone tell me why 24 MP's need to spend in excess of £150,000?

From tygerland.net


Display: Sort:

Re: The League of Parasites (#1)

The Parliamentary Office that I used to working in employed 4 full-time staff, two in London, two in constituency, and one payed trainee. This is not counting the costs of temporary staff/interns who although theoretically are volunteers actually, in reality thay cost the office a small fortune.
Other capital expenses were the cost of the constituency office and its equipment.

With this level of staff we always considered that we could stay pretty much on top of the job. It was always interesting to listen to other wonks complaining of their worklode, who were from other offices who we considered to be under staffed. They usually used one wonk in London and one in constituency.
We claimed oure fair amount of expenses and we certainly did not consider ourselves "parasites".

Re: The League of Parasites (#2)

I repeat...

If thrifty Dennis Skinner (Bolsover, Lab) can get by on expenses of £67,706, can someone tell me why 24 MP's need to spend in excess of £150,000?

Re: The League of Parasites (#3)

Why don't you ask them.  It,s 01272191000 for the switchboard, then ask for the costley MP,office.  I'm sure thay'ed love to respond.(Anderw George is the best to ask.) The Scotish parliament  is transparent. I have no problem with Westminster haveing the same audits as the scots.

Re: The League of Parasites (#4)

Got that wrong .. it's 02072191000.

Re: The League of Parasites (#6)

No, it's 0207 219 3000.

Different MPs will spend different amounts depending on the the burden that is placed on their office. Isn't that obvious?

Somebody menionted Bolsover. Ask yourself: in Bolsover District, how many immigrants do you have? how many council tennant? how many people claiming tax credits? how many people likely to experience problems with the CSA? I could go on, but a constituency like, say, Leeds Central will clearly require more staff and resources than a more prosperous one.

Re: The League of Parasites (#8)

1000 works for me

Re: The League of Parasites (#9)

Some MPs in usually considered prosperous constituencies claim more expenses in Office running costs/Staffing costs section than MPs in not prosperous seats.
For Mark Oaten in Winchester spends more than Hilary Benn in running his office

Re: The League of Parasites (#10)

All I can say is that I work in an inner city constituency office and we require more caseworking staff than neighbouring constituencies. we can't even afford to employ somebody in Westminster.

Re: The League of Parasites (#5)

Nobody can beat George Galloway

Re: The League of Parasites (#7)

But I'll give it a go...Whears that baseball bat?