Labour's slow moving selections

As my last blog on retiring MPs provoked so much reaction, I thought the latest piece I have written for Tribune on Labour's slow moving selection process would be of interest.
If Labour doesn't get its skates on soon and makes sure we have good strong candidates campaigning in our key seats, then we could be delivering the next election to the Tories. They are well organised we are not.

Parliamentary selections: Labour stuck at starting gate
BARCKLEY SUMNER

LABOUR'S slow-moving selection system could place the party at a serious disadvantage at the next general election, it is feared.
Both the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have already selected a large proportion of their candidates in the constituencies likely to be the key battlegrounds. So far, Labour has just selected one parliamentary candidate in total.
Although selections are under way in some of the seats that Labour lost in 2005, others have not even started. These include Stephen Twigg's former Enfield Southgate seat and Manchester Withington, a shock loss to the Lib Dems.
Boundary changes have made the selection process more complex. Several Labour-held seats have become more marginal, while others now have notional Conservative majorities.
A number of new constituencies have been created. Two of these, Filton & Bradley Stoke (notional Conservative majority 1,201) and Derbyshire Mid (notional Conservative majority 2,971) are Labour prospects. Labour's selection process has not begun. In Filton the Conservatives and Lib Dems have selected their candidates. A Tory is in place in Derbyshire Mid.
Before the 2005 general election, the Conservatives selected many of their candidates early and in many cases achieved good electoral results. This situation greatly helped by rich benefactors such as Lord Ashcroft who pumped large amounts of money into selected seats. With Conservative candidates in place in many Labour-held marginals and few rules governing expenditure prior to a election being called, it is feared that the next election could be skewed in the Tories' favour through their greater financial resources and long-term campaigning.
The strategy of selecting candidates in marginal constituencies before Labour-held seats where the MP is retiring may also have backfired. Many of the strongest candidates have made a conscious decision not to seek a marginal seat but instead are keeping their powder dry for when safer seats start selecting.
While the progress for selecting candidates is slow in England, the process has not even started in Scotland and Wales. These have been deferred until after next May's elections for the Scottish Parliament and Wales Assembly, making it unlikely that any selections will be completed until autumn 2007.
In Scotland, there are five seats that Labour lost in 2005. In Wales, there are five seats Labour hopes to regain and one, Arfon in north-west Wales, where redrawn boundaries give Labour a strong chance of winning the seat from the nationalists.
Meanwhile, Daniel Zeichner, a UNISON official, has been chosen to fight Cambridge. Labour lost the seat to the Lib Dems in 2005, who have a 4,300 majority.


Display: Sort:

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#1)

Good points.
In recent times both Conservatives and Libdems have tried to select their candidates earlier (so more time to raise their local profile and so on)
I think Labour's selection process is a bit more complex (and so slower) than the Con and Libdem one

The fact that some not Labour held marginals have started to select earlier than Lab held seats and so potential candidates aren't submitting themself to wait for Labour held seats has potentially always been present thanks to late retirements.

The boundary changes will also put Labour marginally ahead in some seats (like Lancaster and Fleetwood, Northampton South)...I don't think the selection process started in them either, but I think they should wait for the end of reselection process in next door seats (which are also affected by boundary changes)

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#2)

"Although selections are under way in some of the seats that Labour lost in 2005, others have not even started. These include Stephen Twigg's former Enfield Southgate seat and Manchester Withington, a shock loss to the Lib Dems."

Withington selection has been covered today by the
local paper.
It seems the hope is to have a candidate in place by early 2007.

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#3)

My understanding is that Withington will definitely by an all women shortlist. It was decided at the most recent NEC orgnaisation sub-committee. I hope to have a full list of the other seats where they decided to be open or AWS next week.

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#4)

Many thanks!

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#5)

Yes and they also decided it would be wise to actually ask the CLP for their consent too.

No idea how that is progressing or if it would make a difference either way however I know my branch came out firmly in favour of an all woman shortlist.

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#6)

Manchester Withington CLP agreed by an overwhelming majority last week to accept an all women short list.

Re: Labour's slow moving selections (#7)

yes, apparently more than 90% backed the AWS